<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>13(14)</volume><submitter>von Stein P</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;b>Background/Objectives:&lt;/b> Previous trials reported comparable results with PASCAL and earlier MitraClip generations. Limited comparative data exist for more contemporary MitraClip generations, particularly the large MitraClip XT(R/W). We aimed to evaluate acute and 30-day outcomes in patients undergoing mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) with one of the large devices, either PASCAL P10 or MitraClip XT(R/W) (3rd/4th generation). &lt;b>Methods:&lt;/b> A total of 309 PASCAL-treated patients were matched by propensity score to 253 MitraClip-treated patients, resulting in 200 adequately balanced pairs. Procedural, clinical, and echocardiographic outcomes were collected for up to 30 days, including subgroup analysis for mitral regurgitation (MR) etiologies. &lt;b>Results&lt;/b>: PAS</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of clinical medicine</journal><pagination>4187</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11278441</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Early Outcomes of Two Large Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair Devices-A Propensity Score Matched Multicenter Comparison.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11278441</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Mauri V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Luedike P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rudolph F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thiele H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pfister R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Boeder N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mollmann H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Novotny J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rassaf T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kelm M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Polzin A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tanaka T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kavsur R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mues C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wienemann H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Weber M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Weckbach L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>von Bardeleben RS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ozturk C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Haurand JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Baldus S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>von Stein P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grothusen C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ruf T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nef H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guthoff H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>von Stein J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sugiura A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gercek M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hausleiter J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kister T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lurz P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rudolph V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mahabadi AA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Horn P</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Early Outcomes of Two Large Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair Devices-A Propensity Score Matched Multicenter Comparison.</name><description>&lt;b>Background/Objectives:&lt;/b> Previous trials reported comparable results with PASCAL and earlier MitraClip generations. Limited comparative data exist for more contemporary MitraClip generations, particularly the large MitraClip XT(R/W). We aimed to evaluate acute and 30-day outcomes in patients undergoing mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) with one of the large devices, either PASCAL P10 or MitraClip XT(R/W) (3rd/4th generation). &lt;b>Methods:&lt;/b> A total of 309 PASCAL-treated patients were matched by propensity score to 253 MitraClip-treated patients, resulting in 200 adequately balanced pairs. Procedural, clinical, and echocardiographic outcomes were collected for up to 30 days, including subgroup analysis for mitral regurgitation (MR) etiologies. &lt;b>Results&lt;/b>: PAS</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Jul</publication><modification>2026-04-15T03:21:35.582Z</modification><creation>2025-08-31T03:04:56.622Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11278441</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39064227</pubmed><doi>10.3390/jcm13144187</doi></cross_references></HashMap>