biostudies-literatureUnknown12Zha B<h4>Background</h4>Some research has already reported the diagnostic value of artificial intelligence (AI) in different endoscopy outcomes. However, the evidence is confusing and of varying quality.<h4>Objective</h4>This review aimed to comprehensively evaluate the credibility of the evidence of AI's diagnostic accuracy in endoscopy.<h4>Methods</h4>Before the study began, the protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023483073). First, 2 researchers searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library using comprehensive search terms. Then, researchers screened the articles and extracted information. We used A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR2) to evaluate the quality of the articles. When there were multiple studies aiming at the same result, we chose the sJMIR medical informaticse56361https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11296324biostudies-literatureDiagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy: Umbrella Review.PMC11296324Zha BCai AWang GfalseDiagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy: Umbrella Review.<h4>Background</h4>Some research has already reported the diagnostic value of artificial intelligence (AI) in different endoscopy outcomes. However, the evidence is confusing and of varying quality.<h4>Objective</h4>This review aimed to comprehensively evaluate the credibility of the evidence of AI's diagnostic accuracy in endoscopy.<h4>Methods</h4>Before the study began, the protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023483073). First, 2 researchers searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library using comprehensive search terms. Then, researchers screened the articles and extracted information. We used A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR2) to evaluate the quality of the articles. When there were multiple studies aiming at the same result, we chose the s2024-01-01T00:00:00Z2024 Jul2026-03-13T10:25:59.274Z2025-02-19T02:27:17.881ZS-EPMC112963243909371510.2196/56361