<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Hamilton KW</submitter><funding>NIAID NIH HHS</funding><pagination>ofae388</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11297503</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>11(8)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>During the COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies for preexposure prophylaxis (SMA-PrEP) offered patients who were immunocompromised another option for protection. However, SMA-PrEP posed administrative, operational, and ethical challenges for health care facilities, resulting in few patients receiving them. Although the first SMA-PrEP medication, tixagevimab and cilgavimab, had its authorization revoked due to compromised in vitro efficacy, new SMA-PrEP medications are currently completing clinical trials. This article provides an operational framework for administrative organization, patient identification and prioritization, equitable medication allocation, medication ordering and administration, and patient tracking.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A retrospective cohort</pubmed_abstract><journal>Open forum infectious diseases</journal><pubmed_title>Implementation of an Approach to Equitable Allocation of SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibodies for Preexposure Prophylaxis: Experience From a Single Medical Center.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11297503</pmcid><funding_grant_id>UM1 AI144288</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Fernandez Lynch H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Payne AS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dutcher L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Takach P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tebas P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Doucette AG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Craig E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Civitello T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Blumberg EA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ahya VN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Degnan KO</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Holzman L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jacobs DA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Geara A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hua E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hamilton KW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koenig H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pratz K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kannel EZ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gabriel P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Werner D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Junker P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Garfall A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Capozzi D</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Implementation of an Approach to Equitable Allocation of SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibodies for Preexposure Prophylaxis: Experience From a Single Medical Center.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>During the COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies for preexposure prophylaxis (SMA-PrEP) offered patients who were immunocompromised another option for protection. However, SMA-PrEP posed administrative, operational, and ethical challenges for health care facilities, resulting in few patients receiving them. Although the first SMA-PrEP medication, tixagevimab and cilgavimab, had its authorization revoked due to compromised in vitro efficacy, new SMA-PrEP medications are currently completing clinical trials. This article provides an operational framework for administrative organization, patient identification and prioritization, equitable medication allocation, medication ordering and administration, and patient tracking.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A retrospective cohort</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Aug</publication><modification>2026-05-04T06:47:05.402Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T04:40:33.832Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11297503</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39100528</pubmed><doi>10.1093/ofid/ofae388</doi></cross_references></HashMap>