<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>21(7)</volume><submitter>Kim SH</submitter><funding>Bukwang Pharmaceuticals</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lurasidone (160 mg/day) compared to quetiapine XR (QXR; 600 mg/day) in the treatment of acutely psychotic patients with schizophrenia.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Patients were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with lurasidone 160 mg/day (n=105) or QXR 600 mg/day (n=105). Primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline to week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score and Clinical Global Impressions severity (CGI-S) score. Adverse events, body measurements, and laboratory parameters were assessed.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Lurasidone demonstrated non-inferiority to QXR on the PANSS total score. Adjusted mean±standard error change at week 6 on the PANSS total score was -26.42±2.02 and -2</pubmed_abstract><journal>Psychiatry investigation</journal><pagination>762-771</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11298266</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Efficacy and Safety of Lurasidone vs. Quetiapine XR in Acutely Psychotic Patients With Schizophrenia in Korea: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11298266</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Youn H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim CE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Choi J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee KY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee JS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim SG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee BJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jung SW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chee HS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim SI</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim SH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Won S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim WH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cheon EJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kang N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim MH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Song HR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Oh HS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee HJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim DH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Park JI</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim HG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee SH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roh S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Park DH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Paik JW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cho SJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee BO</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee KU</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chang JG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee SY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jung DU</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jung HY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chung IW</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Efficacy and Safety of Lurasidone vs. Quetiapine XR in Acutely Psychotic Patients With Schizophrenia in Korea: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lurasidone (160 mg/day) compared to quetiapine XR (QXR; 600 mg/day) in the treatment of acutely psychotic patients with schizophrenia.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Patients were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with lurasidone 160 mg/day (n=105) or QXR 600 mg/day (n=105). Primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline to week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score and Clinical Global Impressions severity (CGI-S) score. Adverse events, body measurements, and laboratory parameters were assessed.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Lurasidone demonstrated non-inferiority to QXR on the PANSS total score. Adjusted mean±standard error change at week 6 on the PANSS total score was -26.42±2.02 and -2</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Jul</publication><modification>2025-04-18T22:38:43.143Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T04:41:04.047Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11298266</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39089702</pubmed><doi>10.30773/pi.2024.0052</doi></cross_references></HashMap>