<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9(3)</volume><submitter>Winston McPherson G</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>The goal of this preliminary study is to describe the vaginal microbiome of transgender and gender nonbinary (TGNB) individuals using nonculture-based techniques. TGNB individuals may undergo gender-affirming surgical procedures, which can include the creation of a neovagina. Little is known about microbial species that comprise this environment in states of health or disease.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>In this pilot study, vaginal swabs were self-collected from 15 healthy self-identified TGNB participants (age 26-69 years) and 8 cisgender comparator participants (age 27-50 years) between 2017 and 2018. Next-generation 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing was used to profile individual bacterial communities from all study samples.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The TGNB cohort demonstrated significantly higher intraindividual (alpha) diversity than the cisgender group (&lt;i>p&lt;/i>=0.0003). Microbial species commensal to the gut and skin were identified only in specimens from TGNB participants. Although &lt;i>Lactobacillus&lt;/i> species were dominant in all cisgender comparator samples, they were found at low relative abundance (≤3%) in TGNB samples.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>In this study, specimens collected from neovaginas showed increased alpha diversity and substantially different composition compared with natal vaginas. In contrast to natal vaginas, neovaginas were not dominated by &lt;i>Lactobacillus&lt;/i>, but were hosts to many microbial species. Studies that help to improve our understanding of the neovaginal microbiome may enable clinicians to differentiate between healthy and diseased neovaginal states.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Transgender health</journal><pagination>205-211</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11299096</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>The Vaginal Microbiome of Transgender and Gender Nonbinary Individuals.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11299096</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Greene DN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Winston McPherson G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Salipante SJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hoffman NG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Goldstein Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rongitsch J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dy GW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Penewit K</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The Vaginal Microbiome of Transgender and Gender Nonbinary Individuals.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>The goal of this preliminary study is to describe the vaginal microbiome of transgender and gender nonbinary (TGNB) individuals using nonculture-based techniques. TGNB individuals may undergo gender-affirming surgical procedures, which can include the creation of a neovagina. Little is known about microbial species that comprise this environment in states of health or disease.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>In this pilot study, vaginal swabs were self-collected from 15 healthy self-identified TGNB participants (age 26-69 years) and 8 cisgender comparator participants (age 27-50 years) between 2017 and 2018. Next-generation 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing was used to profile individual bacterial communities from all study samples.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The TGNB cohort demonstrated significantly higher intraindividual (alpha) diversity than the cisgender group (&lt;i>p&lt;/i>=0.0003). Microbial species commensal to the gut and skin were identified only in specimens from TGNB participants. Although &lt;i>Lactobacillus&lt;/i> species were dominant in all cisgender comparator samples, they were found at low relative abundance (≤3%) in TGNB samples.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>In this study, specimens collected from neovaginas showed increased alpha diversity and substantially different composition compared with natal vaginas. In contrast to natal vaginas, neovaginas were not dominated by &lt;i>Lactobacillus&lt;/i>, but were hosts to many microbial species. Studies that help to improve our understanding of the neovaginal microbiome may enable clinicians to differentiate between healthy and diseased neovaginal states.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Jun</publication><modification>2025-07-27T03:10:51.511Z</modification><creation>2025-07-27T03:10:51.511Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11299096</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39109262</pubmed><doi>10.1089/trgh.2022.0100</doi></cross_references></HashMap>