<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>24(1)</volume><submitter>Peeler J</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries and diseases place a significant burden on the health care system. Despite this, research indicates that physician training in the area of MSK medicine has historically been inadequate, with a majority of medical students feeling that their training in MSK medicine is lacking. The goal of this investigation was to evaluate the efficacy of a new preclinical MSK curriculum that was implemented within a nationally accredited allopathic medical program.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Retrospective analysis was completed on five consecutive years (2017-2021) of preclinical MSK curricular data for 549 medical students, including mid and end-of-course examinations and end-of-course student satisfaction surveys. Both parametric and non-parametric methods of analysis were used to examine within and between class differences (P &lt; 0.05).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The new MSK curriculum covered 15 of 16 "core or must know" topics in MSK medicine, and academic performance was consistently high over the 5-year period of analysis (final course marks ranged from 76.6 ± 7.1 to 81.4 ± 8.1; failures/year: range from 0 to 4), being equal or above levels of student performance observed for other courses delivered during preclinical studies. Likert data from end-of-course surveys demonstrated that feedback was overwhelmingly positive (overall course satisfaction ranged from a low of 3.07/4.00 to a high of 3.56/4.00) and indicated that students felt that the new preclinical MSK curriculum did effectively support medical student learning and knowledge retention.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Results are expected to help advance the current body of knowledge that is dedicated to improving physician learning and knowledge retention in the area of MSK medicine and provides a curricular model that could be used by other nationally accredited medical programs to help enhance MSK learning at the preclinical levels of physician training.</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMC medical education</journal><pagination>845</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11304564</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Addressing musculoskeletal curricular inadequacies within undergraduate medical education.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11304564</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Peeler J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Addressing musculoskeletal curricular inadequacies within undergraduate medical education.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries and diseases place a significant burden on the health care system. Despite this, research indicates that physician training in the area of MSK medicine has historically been inadequate, with a majority of medical students feeling that their training in MSK medicine is lacking. The goal of this investigation was to evaluate the efficacy of a new preclinical MSK curriculum that was implemented within a nationally accredited allopathic medical program.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Retrospective analysis was completed on five consecutive years (2017-2021) of preclinical MSK curricular data for 549 medical students, including mid and end-of-course examinations and end-of-course student satisfaction surveys. Both parametric and non-parametric methods of analysis were used to examine within and between class differences (P &lt; 0.05).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The new MSK curriculum covered 15 of 16 "core or must know" topics in MSK medicine, and academic performance was consistently high over the 5-year period of analysis (final course marks ranged from 76.6 ± 7.1 to 81.4 ± 8.1; failures/year: range from 0 to 4), being equal or above levels of student performance observed for other courses delivered during preclinical studies. Likert data from end-of-course surveys demonstrated that feedback was overwhelmingly positive (overall course satisfaction ranged from a low of 3.07/4.00 to a high of 3.56/4.00) and indicated that students felt that the new preclinical MSK curriculum did effectively support medical student learning and knowledge retention.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Results are expected to help advance the current body of knowledge that is dedicated to improving physician learning and knowledge retention in the area of MSK medicine and provides a curricular model that could be used by other nationally accredited medical programs to help enhance MSK learning at the preclinical levels of physician training.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Aug</publication><modification>2025-04-26T05:29:39.61Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T11:32:24.143Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11304564</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39107718</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s12909-024-05849-6</doi></cross_references></HashMap>