{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["19"],"submitter":["Andino-Molina M"],"funding":["Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Objective</h4>To provide a comprehensive characterization of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> antimicrobial resistance (AMR) data in veterinary medicine based on the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of all antimicrobial agents tested in relation to the techniques used.<h4>Methods</h4>A systematic scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and its associated checklist. The objective was to provide a synthesis of the evidence in a summarized and analyzed format.To this end, three scientific databases were consulted: Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science, up until December 2021. Subsequently, all identified literature was subjected to screening and classifica"],"journal":["One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)"],"pagination":["100860"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11327573"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Antimicrobial resistance of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> in veterinary medicine around the world: A scoping review of minimum inhibitory concentrations."],"pmcid":["PMC11327573"],"pubmed_authors":["Seyboldt C","Abdel-Glil M","Pletz MW","Andino-Molina M","Dost I","Neubauer H"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Antimicrobial resistance of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> in veterinary medicine around the world: A scoping review of minimum inhibitory concentrations.","description":"<h4>Objective</h4>To provide a comprehensive characterization of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> antimicrobial resistance (AMR) data in veterinary medicine based on the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of all antimicrobial agents tested in relation to the techniques used.<h4>Methods</h4>A systematic scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and its associated checklist. The objective was to provide a synthesis of the evidence in a summarized and analyzed format.To this end, three scientific databases were consulted: Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science, up until December 2021. Subsequently, all identified literature was subjected to screening and classifica","dates":{"release":"2024-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2024 Dec","modification":"2025-04-21T22:10:07.467Z","creation":"2025-04-21T22:10:07.467Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC11327573","cross_references":{"pubmed":["39157654"],"doi":["10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100860"]}}