<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>5(4)</volume><submitter>Chai KL</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Serious infection is common in patients with multiple myeloma due to immune deficiency from the underlying disease and/or its treatment. Immunoglobulin replacement is one approach to reduce infection risk in these patients. However, few real-world data exist on its use in patients with myeloma. We investigated immunoglobulin use in Australia, New Zealand and Asia-Pacific using registry data and explored its association with survival outcomes. A total of 2374 patients with a median follow-up time of 29.5 months (interquartile range 13.3-54.3 months) were included in the analysis - 1673 from Australia, 313 Korea, 281 New Zealand and 107 Singapore. Overall, 7.1% of participants received immunoglobulin replacement within 24 months of diagnosis. Patients who received immunoglobulin replacement </pubmed_abstract><journal>EJHaem</journal><pagination>690-697</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11327709</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Variation in immunoglobulin use and impact on survival in myeloma.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11327709</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Chng WJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moore EM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Augustson BM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McCaughan GJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yoon SS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Harrison SJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tso AC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thao L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Murphy N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wong KS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tan XN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cooke R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wellard C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>King T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hocking J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McQuilten ZK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aoki N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Morrissey CO</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Forsyth CJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mollee P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wood EM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Spencer A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Goh YT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim JS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Quach H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hamad N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kerridge I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chai KL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Blacklock H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ho PJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bapat A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Variation in immunoglobulin use and impact on survival in myeloma.</name><description>Serious infection is common in patients with multiple myeloma due to immune deficiency from the underlying disease and/or its treatment. Immunoglobulin replacement is one approach to reduce infection risk in these patients. However, few real-world data exist on its use in patients with myeloma. We investigated immunoglobulin use in Australia, New Zealand and Asia-Pacific using registry data and explored its association with survival outcomes. A total of 2374 patients with a median follow-up time of 29.5 months (interquartile range 13.3-54.3 months) were included in the analysis - 1673 from Australia, 313 Korea, 281 New Zealand and 107 Singapore. Overall, 7.1% of participants received immunoglobulin replacement within 24 months of diagnosis. Patients who received immunoglobulin replacement </description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Aug</publication><modification>2025-04-19T14:50:30.802Z</modification><creation>2025-04-19T14:50:30.802Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11327709</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39157592</pubmed><doi>10.1002/jha2.938</doi></cross_references></HashMap>