<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>14(5)</volume><submitter>Singh BK</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To assess the perceived social support and professional quality of life (ProQOL) among healthcare professionals during COVID-19 pandemic in Nepal, encompassing both positive (compassion satisfaction) and negative (compassion fatigue) dimensions as well as the factors associated with them.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>A cross-sectional web-based study.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>Nepal PARTICIPANTS: We carried out a convenience sampling technique to enrol 313 health professionals aged 18-60 years old.&lt;h4>Outcome measures&lt;/h4>We employed the ProQOL V.5 questionnaire (comparing 30 self-report items) and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support with 12 items to assess the ProQOL and social support, respectively. A χ&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> test was performed to determine associated factors of different dimensions of ProQOL.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The study included a total of 313 participants, mostly consisting of frontline health workers. More than one-third of the participants worked in places where precautionary measures were insufficient. However, the majority of them (73.8%) had high social support. Concerning the ProQOL, the percentage of health professionals that had moderate compassion satisfaction (CS), moderate Burnout (BO) and moderate secondary traumatic stress (STS) were 57.5%, 58.2% and 75.4%, respectively. Factors like sex, marital status, profession, work-shift, type of health institution and status of precautionary measures at the workplace were associated with the different dimensions of ProQOL at the significance level of 0.05.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>This study findings revealed a considerable proportion of BO and STS among health professionals during COVID-19 pandemic in Nepal. Implementation of appropriate interventions and support systems are needed to enhance CS, alleviate BO and mitigate STS among health professionals to combat future health emergencies.</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMJ open</journal><pagination>e085535</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11328656</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Perceived social support and professional quality of life of health professionals during COVID-19 pandemic in Nepal: a cross-sectional study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11328656</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Singh BK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bista PR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pahari DP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Humagain U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pandey S</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Perceived social support and professional quality of life of health professionals during COVID-19 pandemic in Nepal: a cross-sectional study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To assess the perceived social support and professional quality of life (ProQOL) among healthcare professionals during COVID-19 pandemic in Nepal, encompassing both positive (compassion satisfaction) and negative (compassion fatigue) dimensions as well as the factors associated with them.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>A cross-sectional web-based study.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>Nepal PARTICIPANTS: We carried out a convenience sampling technique to enrol 313 health professionals aged 18-60 years old.&lt;h4>Outcome measures&lt;/h4>We employed the ProQOL V.5 questionnaire (comparing 30 self-report items) and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support with 12 items to assess the ProQOL and social support, respectively. A χ&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> test was performed to determine associated factors of different dimensions of ProQOL.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The study included a total of 313 participants, mostly consisting of frontline health workers. More than one-third of the participants worked in places where precautionary measures were insufficient. However, the majority of them (73.8%) had high social support. Concerning the ProQOL, the percentage of health professionals that had moderate compassion satisfaction (CS), moderate Burnout (BO) and moderate secondary traumatic stress (STS) were 57.5%, 58.2% and 75.4%, respectively. Factors like sex, marital status, profession, work-shift, type of health institution and status of precautionary measures at the workplace were associated with the different dimensions of ProQOL at the significance level of 0.05.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>This study findings revealed a considerable proportion of BO and STS among health professionals during COVID-19 pandemic in Nepal. Implementation of appropriate interventions and support systems are needed to enhance CS, alleviate BO and mitigate STS among health professionals to combat future health emergencies.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 May</publication><modification>2025-04-26T21:23:19.51Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T16:45:35.862Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11328656</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38803250</pubmed><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085535</doi></cross_references></HashMap>