<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Spence T</submitter><funding>National Institute for Health and Care Research</funding><pagination>2339</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11360737</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>24(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a serious public health issue in many countries. Online postal self-sampling (OPSS) is increasingly used to test for STIs, a trend accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. There remains limited understanding of how service users experience OPSS and what leads them to access it over clinic-based services, or vice versa. This research seeks to address these gaps, by undertaking a large qualitative study which sits within the ASSIST study, a mixed-methods, realist evaluation of OPSS.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Participants were recruited via clinic-based and online sexual health services in three case study areas in England. Purposive sampling was used to over-represent populations disproportionately affected by poor sexual health: young people; </pubmed_abstract><journal>BMC public health</journal><pubmed_title>How does online postal self-sampling (OPSS) shape access to testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs)? A qualitative study of service users.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11360737</pmcid><funding_grant_id>NIHR129157</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Dewsnap C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gibbs J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Day S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Apea V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mercer CH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mohammed H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Williams A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Spence T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sullivan A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ross JDC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Crundwell D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Burns F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sheringham J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Howarth A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jackson L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Winter A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wong G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Reid D</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>How does online postal self-sampling (OPSS) shape access to testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs)? A qualitative study of service users.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a serious public health issue in many countries. Online postal self-sampling (OPSS) is increasingly used to test for STIs, a trend accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. There remains limited understanding of how service users experience OPSS and what leads them to access it over clinic-based services, or vice versa. This research seeks to address these gaps, by undertaking a large qualitative study which sits within the ASSIST study, a mixed-methods, realist evaluation of OPSS.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Participants were recruited via clinic-based and online sexual health services in three case study areas in England. Purposive sampling was used to over-represent populations disproportionately affected by poor sexual health: young people; </description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Aug</publication><modification>2025-04-05T12:29:42.97Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T12:29:42.97Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11360737</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39198751</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s12889-024-19741-x</doi></cross_references></HashMap>