<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12</volume><submitter>Direk A</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The aim of this study was to compare the fracture strength and fracture modes of post-cores produced with CAD-CAM from modified polyetheretherketone (PEEK) materials with other custom-produced post-cores.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Sixty human mandibular first premolars with equal root sizes were used. The teeth were divided into six groups (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 10), and root canal treatment was performed. The teeth were separated from the roots over 2 mm from the cemento-enamel junction. As a result of the decoronation process, a 1 mm wide shoulder line was obtained for all teeth. For the fracture strength test, 10 mm deep post spaces were created on the teeth with a 1.6 mm diameter driller. Post-core groups consisted: everStick&lt;sup>®&lt;/sup> glass fiber post-core (Group GF), zirconia post-cor</pubmed_abstract><journal>PeerJ</journal><pagination>e18012</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11380836</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Fracture strength of cad-cam milled polyetheretherketone (PEEK) post-cores &lt;i>vs&lt;/i> conventional post-cores; an &lt;i>in vitro&lt;/i> study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11380836</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Tekin S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Khurshid Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Direk A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Fracture strength of cad-cam milled polyetheretherketone (PEEK) post-cores &lt;i>vs&lt;/i> conventional post-cores; an &lt;i>in vitro&lt;/i> study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The aim of this study was to compare the fracture strength and fracture modes of post-cores produced with CAD-CAM from modified polyetheretherketone (PEEK) materials with other custom-produced post-cores.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Sixty human mandibular first premolars with equal root sizes were used. The teeth were divided into six groups (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 10), and root canal treatment was performed. The teeth were separated from the roots over 2 mm from the cemento-enamel junction. As a result of the decoronation process, a 1 mm wide shoulder line was obtained for all teeth. For the fracture strength test, 10 mm deep post spaces were created on the teeth with a 1.6 mm diameter driller. Post-core groups consisted: everStick&lt;sup>®&lt;/sup> glass fiber post-core (Group GF), zirconia post-cor</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024</publication><modification>2025-04-05T14:38:49.971Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T14:38:49.971Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11380836</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39247541</pubmed><doi>10.7717/peerj.18012</doi></cross_references></HashMap>