<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>31</volume><submitter>Price AT</submitter><funding>Varian Medical Systems</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background and purpose&lt;/h4>Improved hounsfield-unit accuracy of on-board imaging may lead to direct-to-unit treatment approaches We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of using only a diagnostic (dx) computed tomography (CT)-defined target pre-plan in an &lt;i>in silico&lt;/i> study of simulation-free abdominal stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (ART).&lt;h4>Materials and methods&lt;/h4>Eight patients with abdominal treatment sites (five pancreatic cancer, three oligometastases) were treated using an integrated adaptive O-Ring gantry system. Each patient's target was delineated on a dxCT. The target only pre-plan served primarily to seed the ART process. During the ART session, all structures were delineated. All simulated cases were treated to 50 Gy in 5 fractions to a planning target optimization structure (PTV_OPT) to allow for dose escalation within the planning target volume. Timing of steps during this workflow was recorded. Plan quality was compared between ART treatment plans and a plan created on a CT simulation scan using the traditional planning workflow.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The workflow was feasible in all attempts, with organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints met in all fractions despite lack of initial OAR contours. Median absolute difference between the adapted plan and simulation CT plan for the PTV_Opt V95% was 2.0 %. Median absolute difference in the D0.5 cm&lt;sup>3&lt;/sup> between the adapted plan and simulation CT plan was -0.9 Gy for stomach, 1.2 Gy for duodenum, -5.3 Gy for small bowel, and 0.3 Gy for large bowel. Median end-to-end workflow time was 63 min.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>The workflow was feasible for a dxCT-defined target-only pre-plan approach to stereotactic abdominal ART.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Physics and imaging in radiation oncology</journal><pagination>100611</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11382001</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Feasibility of simulation free abdominal stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy using an expedited pre-plan workflow.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11382001</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Schiff JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Beckert R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Silberstein A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Price AT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Samson PP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhao T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hugo GD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Laugeman E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Henke LE</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Feasibility of simulation free abdominal stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy using an expedited pre-plan workflow.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background and purpose&lt;/h4>Improved hounsfield-unit accuracy of on-board imaging may lead to direct-to-unit treatment approaches We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of using only a diagnostic (dx) computed tomography (CT)-defined target pre-plan in an &lt;i>in silico&lt;/i> study of simulation-free abdominal stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (ART).&lt;h4>Materials and methods&lt;/h4>Eight patients with abdominal treatment sites (five pancreatic cancer, three oligometastases) were treated using an integrated adaptive O-Ring gantry system. Each patient's target was delineated on a dxCT. The target only pre-plan served primarily to seed the ART process. During the ART session, all structures were delineated. All simulated cases were treated to 50 Gy in 5 fractions to a planning target optimization structure (PTV_OPT) to allow for dose escalation within the planning target volume. Timing of steps during this workflow was recorded. Plan quality was compared between ART treatment plans and a plan created on a CT simulation scan using the traditional planning workflow.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The workflow was feasible in all attempts, with organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints met in all fractions despite lack of initial OAR contours. Median absolute difference between the adapted plan and simulation CT plan for the PTV_Opt V95% was 2.0 %. Median absolute difference in the D0.5 cm&lt;sup>3&lt;/sup> between the adapted plan and simulation CT plan was -0.9 Gy for stomach, 1.2 Gy for duodenum, -5.3 Gy for small bowel, and 0.3 Gy for large bowel. Median end-to-end workflow time was 63 min.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>The workflow was feasible for a dxCT-defined target-only pre-plan approach to stereotactic abdominal ART.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Jul</publication><modification>2026-06-02T21:57:26.946Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T00:29:50.649Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11382001</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39253730</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.phro.2024.100611</doi></cross_references></HashMap>