<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>5(9)</volume><submitter>Zhou C</submitter><funding>F. Hoffmann-La Roche</funding><funding>F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Previous results from the phase 3 ALESIA study (NCT02838420) revealed that alectinib (a central nervous system [CNS]-active, ALK inhibitor) had clinical benefits in treatment-naïve Asian patients with advanced &lt;i>ALK&lt;/i>-positive NSCLC, consistent with the global ALEX study. We present updated data after more than or equal to 5 years of follow-up from the "last patient in" date.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Adult patients with treatment-naïve, advanced &lt;i>ALK&lt;/i>-positive NSCLC from mainland China, South Korea, and Thailand were randomized 2:1 to receive twice-daily 600 mg alectinib (n = 125) or 250 mg crizotinib (n = 62). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary or exploratory endpoints included overall survival, objective response rate, t</pubmed_abstract><journal>JTO clinical and research reports</journal><pagination>100700</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11399573</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Alectinib Versus Crizotinib in Asian Patients With Treatment-Naive Advanced &lt;i>ALK&lt;/i>-Positive NSCLC: Five-Year Update From the Phase 3 ALESIA Study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11399573</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Kim SW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bu L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhou M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fang J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>He J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lu Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee SH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cheng Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hilton M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yang JJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Archer V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhou C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xu T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Reungwetwattana T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chang J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Qian L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhou J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Alectinib Versus Crizotinib in Asian Patients With Treatment-Naive Advanced &lt;i>ALK&lt;/i>-Positive NSCLC: Five-Year Update From the Phase 3 ALESIA Study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Previous results from the phase 3 ALESIA study (NCT02838420) revealed that alectinib (a central nervous system [CNS]-active, ALK inhibitor) had clinical benefits in treatment-naïve Asian patients with advanced &lt;i>ALK&lt;/i>-positive NSCLC, consistent with the global ALEX study. We present updated data after more than or equal to 5 years of follow-up from the "last patient in" date.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Adult patients with treatment-naïve, advanced &lt;i>ALK&lt;/i>-positive NSCLC from mainland China, South Korea, and Thailand were randomized 2:1 to receive twice-daily 600 mg alectinib (n = 125) or 250 mg crizotinib (n = 62). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary or exploratory endpoints included overall survival, objective response rate, t</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Sep</publication><modification>2025-04-04T11:34:00.718Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T11:34:00.718Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11399573</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39282663</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100700</doi></cross_references></HashMap>