<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12</volume><submitter>Singh B</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Wearable activity trackers, including fitness bands and smartwatches, offer the potential for disease detection by monitoring physiological parameters. However, their accuracy as specific disease diagnostic tools remains uncertain.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate whether wearable activity trackers can be used to detect disease and medical events.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Ten electronic databases were searched for studies published from inception to April 1, 2023. Studies were eligible if they used a wearable activity tracker to diagnose or detect a medical condition or event (eg, falls) in free-living conditions in adults. Meta-analyses were performed to assess the overall area under the curve (%), accuracy (%), sensitivity (%), specifici</pubmed_abstract><journal>JMIR mHealth and uHealth</journal><pagination>e56972</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11399740</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Real-World Accuracy of Wearable Activity Trackers for Detecting Medical Conditions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11399740</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Dumuid D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chastin S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Curtis R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Simpson C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eglitis E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Miatke A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ferguson T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Singh B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maher C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brinsley J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Szeto K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Willems I</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Real-World Accuracy of Wearable Activity Trackers for Detecting Medical Conditions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Wearable activity trackers, including fitness bands and smartwatches, offer the potential for disease detection by monitoring physiological parameters. However, their accuracy as specific disease diagnostic tools remains uncertain.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate whether wearable activity trackers can be used to detect disease and medical events.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Ten electronic databases were searched for studies published from inception to April 1, 2023. Studies were eligible if they used a wearable activity tracker to diagnose or detect a medical condition or event (eg, falls) in free-living conditions in adults. Meta-analyses were performed to assess the overall area under the curve (%), accuracy (%), sensitivity (%), specifici</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Aug</publication><modification>2025-04-04T02:48:59.05Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T02:48:59.05Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11399740</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39213525</pubmed><doi>10.2196/56972</doi></cross_references></HashMap>