<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Stringer A</submitter><funding>Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada</funding><funding>National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism</funding><funding>Institute on Child Health and Human Development</funding><funding>NIDA NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIAAA NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIDA</funding><funding>National Institute on Drug Abuse</funding><funding>Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers</funding><funding>Canadian Institutes of Health Research</funding><funding>CIHR</funding><pagination>ujae098</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11403299</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>80(3)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Benchmark dose analysis aims to estimate the level of exposure to a toxin associated with a clinically significant adverse outcome and quantifies uncertainty using the lower limit of a confidence interval for this level. We develop a novel framework for benchmark dose analysis based on monotone additive dose-response models. We first introduce a flexible approach for fitting monotone additive models via penalized B-splines and Laplace-approximate marginal likelihood. A reflective Newton method is then developed that employs de Boor's algorithm for computing splines and their derivatives for efficient estimation of the benchmark dose. Finally, we develop a novel approach for calculating benchmark dose lower limits based on an approximate pivot for the nonlinear equation solved by the estima</pubmed_abstract><journal>Biometrics</journal><pubmed_title>Semi-parametric benchmark dose analysis with monotone additive models.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11403299</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01 DA008916</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 DA17786</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AA07606</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AA009524</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AA09524</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 DA05460</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>FRN PJT-180551</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 DA00090</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AA18116</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AA13272</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>HD036890</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AA14215</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 DA017786</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AA018116</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R29 DA005460</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 DA03874</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R21 DA021034</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AA06666</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AA006666</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AA08105</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AA10108</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AA06966</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 DA12401</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>RGPIN-03331-2023</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CE140100049</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AA025905</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R21 AA014215</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 DA012401</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AA06390</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 DA0737362</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01-DA08916</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 DA03209</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AA001455</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>RGPIN2017-04207</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 DA06839</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AA006966</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Akkaya Hocagil T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jacobson SW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cook RJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jacobson JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stringer A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ryan LM</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Semi-parametric benchmark dose analysis with monotone additive models.</name><description>Benchmark dose analysis aims to estimate the level of exposure to a toxin associated with a clinically significant adverse outcome and quantifies uncertainty using the lower limit of a confidence interval for this level. We develop a novel framework for benchmark dose analysis based on monotone additive dose-response models. We first introduce a flexible approach for fitting monotone additive models via penalized B-splines and Laplace-approximate marginal likelihood. A reflective Newton method is then developed that employs de Boor's algorithm for computing splines and their derivatives for efficient estimation of the benchmark dose. Finally, we develop a novel approach for calculating benchmark dose lower limits based on an approximate pivot for the nonlinear equation solved by the estima</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Jul</publication><modification>2026-05-03T03:21:54.322Z</modification><creation>2025-04-20T00:42:55.835Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11403299</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39282733</pubmed><doi>10.1093/biomtc/ujae098</doi></cross_references></HashMap>