<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>10(17)</volume><submitter>Lian C</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The efficacy and adeptness of ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4.0 in the precise diagnosis and management of conditions like atopic dermatitis and Autoimmune blistering skin diseases (AIBD) remain to be elucidated. So this study examined the accuracy and effectiveness of the ChatGPT responses related to understanding, therapies, and specific cases of these two conditions.&lt;h4>Method&lt;/h4>Firstly, the responses provided by ChatGPTs to a set of 50 questionnaires underwent evaluation by five distinct dermatologists, with complete adjudication of the third-party reviewer. The comparative analysis included the evaluative efficacy of both ChatGPT3.5 and ChatGPT4.0 against the diagnostic abilities exhibited by three distinct cohorts of qualified clinical professionals. And then, an exami</pubmed_abstract><journal>Heliyon</journal><pagination>e37220</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11419909</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Assessing the ChatGPT aptitude: A competent and effective Dermatology doctor?</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11419909</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Fan G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chokkakula S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Song B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yin C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lian C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yuan X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang Z</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Assessing the ChatGPT aptitude: A competent and effective Dermatology doctor?</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The efficacy and adeptness of ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4.0 in the precise diagnosis and management of conditions like atopic dermatitis and Autoimmune blistering skin diseases (AIBD) remain to be elucidated. So this study examined the accuracy and effectiveness of the ChatGPT responses related to understanding, therapies, and specific cases of these two conditions.&lt;h4>Method&lt;/h4>Firstly, the responses provided by ChatGPTs to a set of 50 questionnaires underwent evaluation by five distinct dermatologists, with complete adjudication of the third-party reviewer. The comparative analysis included the evaluative efficacy of both ChatGPT3.5 and ChatGPT4.0 against the diagnostic abilities exhibited by three distinct cohorts of qualified clinical professionals. And then, an exami</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Sep</publication><modification>2026-06-04T12:15:21.712Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T16:25:36.145Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11419909</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39319150</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37220</doi></cross_references></HashMap>