<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Advani SD</submitter><funding>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</funding><funding>NIDDK NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases</funding><funding>NIH</funding><funding>NCEZID CDC HHS</funding><funding>CDC HHS</funding><pagination>600-603</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11426257</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>79(3)</volume><pubmed_abstract>In a multihospital cohort study of 3392 patients, positive urinalysis parameters had poor positive predictive value for diagnosing urinary tract infection (UTI). Combined urinalysis parameters (pyuria or nitrite) performed better than pyuria alone for ruling out UTI. However, performance of all urinalysis parameters was poor in older women.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America</journal><pubmed_title>Performance of Urinalysis Parameters in Predicting Urinary Tract Infection: Does One Size Fit All?</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11426257</pmcid><funding_grant_id>5U54CK000616-02</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K12DK100024</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U54 CK000616</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K12 DK100024</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Hasan A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Francis A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ahmadi S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Johnson R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schmader KE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rosshandler Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mirza F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tang H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Advani SD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Turner NA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Denniss J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>North R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pardue S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rao M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Anderson DJ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Performance of Urinalysis Parameters in Predicting Urinary Tract Infection: Does One Size Fit All?</name><description>In a multihospital cohort study of 3392 patients, positive urinalysis parameters had poor positive predictive value for diagnosing urinary tract infection (UTI). Combined urinalysis parameters (pyuria or nitrite) performed better than pyuria alone for ruling out UTI. However, performance of all urinalysis parameters was poor in older women.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Sep</publication><modification>2026-05-13T14:49:36.688Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T01:14:35.338Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11426257</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38666412</pubmed><doi>10.1093/cid/ciae230</doi></cross_references></HashMap>