{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Wang Y"],"funding":["SHDC","NKRDPC","Shanghai Municipal Hospital Development Center","Bengbu Medical University Postgraduate Research and Innovation Programme Project","National Health Commission capacity building and continuing Education center","National Natural Science Foundation of China","National Key Research and Development Program of China","Military Commission health care special project","NNSFC"],"pagination":["913-923"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11444853"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["25(10)"],"pubmed_abstract":["Objective
To prospectively compare single-shot (SS) echo-planar imaging (EPI) and field-of-view optimized and constrained undistorted single-shot multiplexed sensitivity-encoding (FOCUS MUSE) for diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in evaluating thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO).Materials and methods
SS EPI and FOCUS MUSE DWIs were obtained from 39 patients with TAO (18 male; mean ± standard deviation: 48.3 ± 13.3 years) and 26 healthy controls (9 male; mean ± standard deviation: 43.0 ± 18.5 years). Two radiologists scored the visual image quality using a 4-point Likert scale. The image quality score, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of extraocular muscles (EOMs) were compared between the two DWIs. Diffe"],"journal":["Korean journal of radiology"],"pubmed_title":["Prospective Comparison of FOCUS MUSE and Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging for Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Evaluating Thyroid-Associated Ophthalmopathy."],"pmcid":["PMC11444853"],"funding_grant_id":["2022YFC2410002","SHDC22022310-B","YXFSC2022JJSJ010","Byycx23036","22BJZ07","82271994","2022YFC2410000","82170858"],"pubmed_authors":["Zhang T","Li T","Cui Y","Xiao Y","Jiang Q","Ma Y","Ni S","Chen X","Wang Y","Dai J","Cheng Y"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Prospective Comparison of FOCUS MUSE and Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging for Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Evaluating Thyroid-Associated Ophthalmopathy.","description":"Objective
To prospectively compare single-shot (SS) echo-planar imaging (EPI) and field-of-view optimized and constrained undistorted single-shot multiplexed sensitivity-encoding (FOCUS MUSE) for diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in evaluating thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO).Materials and methods
SS EPI and FOCUS MUSE DWIs were obtained from 39 patients with TAO (18 male; mean ± standard deviation: 48.3 ± 13.3 years) and 26 healthy controls (9 male; mean ± standard deviation: 43.0 ± 18.5 years). Two radiologists scored the visual image quality using a 4-point Likert scale. The image quality score, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of extraocular muscles (EOMs) were compared between the two DWIs. Diffe","dates":{"release":"2024-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2024 Oct","modification":"2026-06-06T22:14:22.309Z","creation":"2025-04-04T02:36:03.712Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC11444853","cross_references":{"pubmed":["39344548"],"doi":["10.3348/kjr.2024.0177"]}}