{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Bean CAL"],"funding":["NICHD NIH HHS","NIMH NIH HHS","National Institutes of Health","Vanderbilt University"],"pagination":["783-792"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11447136"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["46(3)"],"pubmed_abstract":["The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale - Revised (CESD-R) is a popular self-report screening measure for depression. A 20-item questionnaire with scores ranging from 0 to 4 for each item, the CESD-R can produce total scores ranging from 0 to 80. However, the typical scoring protocol for the CESD-R restricts the range of possible scores to between 0 and 60 to retain the same range and clinical cutoff scores as the original CES-D. Despite the widespread adoption of this scoring approach, the psychometric impact has never been systematically examined. In an undergraduate and community adult sample (<i>n</i> = 869), item response theory analyses indicated that scoring the CESD-R with all 5 response options (CESD-R<sub>5opt</sub>) provided nearly twice as much information about a"],"journal":["Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment"],"pubmed_title":["Improved Scoring of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale - Revised: An Item Response Theory Analysis."],"pmcid":["PMC11447136"],"funding_grant_id":["P50 HD103537","T32MH018921-34","endowment from Patricia and Rodes Hart","T32 MH018921"],"pubmed_authors":["Mueller SB","Abitante G","Cole DA","Bean CAL","Ciesla JA","Cho SJ"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Improved Scoring of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale - Revised: An Item Response Theory Analysis.","description":"The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale - Revised (CESD-R) is a popular self-report screening measure for depression. A 20-item questionnaire with scores ranging from 0 to 4 for each item, the CESD-R can produce total scores ranging from 0 to 80. However, the typical scoring protocol for the CESD-R restricts the range of possible scores to between 0 and 60 to retain the same range and clinical cutoff scores as the original CES-D. Despite the widespread adoption of this scoring approach, the psychometric impact has never been systematically examined. In an undergraduate and community adult sample (<i>n</i> = 869), item response theory analyses indicated that scoring the CESD-R with all 5 response options (CESD-R<sub>5opt</sub>) provided nearly twice as much information about a","dates":{"release":"2024-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2024","modification":"2026-06-13T05:33:13.599Z","creation":"2025-04-06T13:22:51.599Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC11447136","cross_references":{"pubmed":["39372194"],"doi":["10.1007/s10862-024-10155-y"]}}