<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Bean CAL</submitter><funding>NICHD NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIMH NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><funding>Vanderbilt University</funding><pagination>783-792</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11447136</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>46(3)</volume><pubmed_abstract>The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale - Revised (CESD-R) is a popular self-report screening measure for depression. A 20-item questionnaire with scores ranging from 0 to 4 for each item, the CESD-R can produce total scores ranging from 0 to 80. However, the typical scoring protocol for the CESD-R restricts the range of possible scores to between 0 and 60 to retain the same range and clinical cutoff scores as the original CES-D. Despite the widespread adoption of this scoring approach, the psychometric impact has never been systematically examined. In an undergraduate and community adult sample (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 869), item response theory analyses indicated that scoring the CESD-R with all 5 response options (CESD-R&lt;sub>5opt&lt;/sub>) provided nearly twice as much information about a</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment</journal><pubmed_title>Improved Scoring of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale - Revised: An Item Response Theory Analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11447136</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P50 HD103537</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32MH018921-34</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>endowment from Patricia and Rodes Hart</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32 MH018921</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Mueller SB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abitante G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cole DA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bean CAL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ciesla JA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cho SJ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Improved Scoring of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale - Revised: An Item Response Theory Analysis.</name><description>The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale - Revised (CESD-R) is a popular self-report screening measure for depression. A 20-item questionnaire with scores ranging from 0 to 4 for each item, the CESD-R can produce total scores ranging from 0 to 80. However, the typical scoring protocol for the CESD-R restricts the range of possible scores to between 0 and 60 to retain the same range and clinical cutoff scores as the original CES-D. Despite the widespread adoption of this scoring approach, the psychometric impact has never been systematically examined. In an undergraduate and community adult sample (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 869), item response theory analyses indicated that scoring the CESD-R with all 5 response options (CESD-R&lt;sub>5opt&lt;/sub>) provided nearly twice as much information about a</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024</publication><modification>2026-06-13T05:33:13.599Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T13:22:51.599Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11447136</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39372194</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s10862-024-10155-y</doi></cross_references></HashMap>