{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["24(2)"],"submitter":["Kim DH"],"funding":["Korean Liver Cancer Association"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Backgrounds/aims</h4>To systematically evaluate inter-reader agreement in the assessment of individual liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) category M (LR-M) imaging features in computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) LIRADS v2018, and to explore the causes of poor agreement in LR-M assignment.<h4>Methods</h4>Original studies reporting inter-reader agreement for LR-M features on multiphasic CT or MRI were identified using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. The pooled kappa coefficient (κ) was calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics. Subgroup meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore the study heterogeneity.<h4>Results</h4>In total, 24 eligible studies"],"journal":["Journal of liver cancer"],"pagination":["192-205"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11449575"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Inter-reader agreement for CT/MRI LI-RADS category M imaging features: a systematic review and meta-analysis."],"pmcid":["PMC11449575"],"pubmed_authors":["Kim DH","Choi SH"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Inter-reader agreement for CT/MRI LI-RADS category M imaging features: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","description":"<h4>Backgrounds/aims</h4>To systematically evaluate inter-reader agreement in the assessment of individual liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) category M (LR-M) imaging features in computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) LIRADS v2018, and to explore the causes of poor agreement in LR-M assignment.<h4>Methods</h4>Original studies reporting inter-reader agreement for LR-M features on multiphasic CT or MRI were identified using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. The pooled kappa coefficient (κ) was calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics. Subgroup meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore the study heterogeneity.<h4>Results</h4>In total, 24 eligible studies","dates":{"release":"2024-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2024 Sep","modification":"2025-04-18T13:05:29.844Z","creation":"2025-04-06T22:36:39.922Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC11449575","cross_references":{"pubmed":["38616543"],"doi":["10.17998/jlc.2024.04.05"]}}