<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Lopes Rego AT</submitter><funding>Dutch Research Council (NWO)</funding><pagination>e1012117</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11458034</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>20(9)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Although word predictability is commonly considered an important factor in reading, sophisticated accounts of predictability in theories of reading are lacking. Computational models of reading traditionally use cloze norming as a proxy of word predictability, but what cloze norms precisely capture remains unclear. This study investigates whether large language models (LLMs) can fill this gap. Contextual predictions are implemented via a novel parallel-graded mechanism, where all predicted words at a given position are pre-activated as a function of contextual certainty, which varies dynamically as text processing unfolds. Through reading simulations with OB1-reader, a cognitive model of word recognition and eye-movement control in reading, we compare the model's fit to eye-movement data when using predictability values derived from a cloze task against those derived from LLMs (GPT-2 and LLaMA). Root Mean Square Error between simulated and human eye movements indicates that LLM predictability provides a better fit than cloze. This is the first study to use LLMs to augment a cognitive model of reading with higher-order language processing while proposing a mechanism on the interplay between word predictability and eye movements.</pubmed_abstract><journal>PLoS computational biology</journal><pubmed_title>Language models outperform cloze predictability in a cognitive model of reading.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11458034</pmcid><funding_grant_id>406.21.GO.019</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Snell J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Meeter M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lopes Rego AT</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Language models outperform cloze predictability in a cognitive model of reading.</name><description>Although word predictability is commonly considered an important factor in reading, sophisticated accounts of predictability in theories of reading are lacking. Computational models of reading traditionally use cloze norming as a proxy of word predictability, but what cloze norms precisely capture remains unclear. This study investigates whether large language models (LLMs) can fill this gap. Contextual predictions are implemented via a novel parallel-graded mechanism, where all predicted words at a given position are pre-activated as a function of contextual certainty, which varies dynamically as text processing unfolds. Through reading simulations with OB1-reader, a cognitive model of word recognition and eye-movement control in reading, we compare the model's fit to eye-movement data when using predictability values derived from a cloze task against those derived from LLMs (GPT-2 and LLaMA). Root Mean Square Error between simulated and human eye movements indicates that LLM predictability provides a better fit than cloze. This is the first study to use LLMs to augment a cognitive model of reading with higher-order language processing while proposing a mechanism on the interplay between word predictability and eye movements.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Sep</publication><modification>2025-04-18T13:03:34.344Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T22:33:12.027Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11458034</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39321153</pubmed><doi>10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012117</doi></cross_references></HashMap>