{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Zamantakis A"],"funding":["NLM NIH HHS"],"pagination":["111"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11462864"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["5(1)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Objective</h4>To identify innovation and implementation determinants of HIV testing, diagnosis, and linkage-to-care in the U.S.<h4>Data sources and study setting</h4>Between November 2020 and January 2022, a broad search strategy was employed in three literature databases: Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science.<h4>Study design</h4>A systematic review guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement.<h4>Data collection/extraction methods</h4>A team of master's and Ph.D.-level researchers screened eligible studies against the inclusion criteria and extracted the data using COVIDENCE software in pairs with consensus performed by a senior member of the team. Barriers and facilitators were extracted and analyzed according to the Consol"],"journal":["Implementation science communications"],"pubmed_title":["Innovation and implementation determinants of HIV testing and linkage-to-care in the U.S.: a systematic review."],"pmcid":["PMC11462864"],"funding_grant_id":["T15 LM007124"],"pubmed_authors":["Pachicano AM","Zapata JP","Li D","Mustanski B","Mongrella M","Merle JL","Zamantakis A","Benbow N","Deskins J","Gallo C","Queiroz AA","Smith JD"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Innovation and implementation determinants of HIV testing and linkage-to-care in the U.S.: a systematic review.","description":"<h4>Objective</h4>To identify innovation and implementation determinants of HIV testing, diagnosis, and linkage-to-care in the U.S.<h4>Data sources and study setting</h4>Between November 2020 and January 2022, a broad search strategy was employed in three literature databases: Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science.<h4>Study design</h4>A systematic review guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement.<h4>Data collection/extraction methods</h4>A team of master's and Ph.D.-level researchers screened eligible studies against the inclusion criteria and extracted the data using COVIDENCE software in pairs with consensus performed by a senior member of the team. Barriers and facilitators were extracted and analyzed according to the Consol","dates":{"release":"2024-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2024 Oct","modification":"2026-07-14T20:43:59.371Z","creation":"2025-04-06T12:49:02.505Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC11462864","cross_references":{"pubmed":["39380128"],"doi":["10.1186/s43058-024-00638-0"]}}