{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Frank-Crawford MA"],"funding":["Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","NICHD NIH HHS","Eunice K. Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)"],"pagination":["840-858"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11486563"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["57(4)"],"pubmed_abstract":["Despite the efficacy of functional analyses in identifying the function of challenging behavior, clinicians report not always using them, partly due to safety concerns. Understanding how researchers employ safeguards to mitigate risks, particularly with dangerous topographies like self-injurious behavior (SIB), is important to guide research and practice. However, the results of a scoping review of functional analyses of self-injurious behavior conducted by Weeden et al. (2010) revealed that only 19.83% of publications included protections. We extended the work of Weeden et al. to determine whether reporting has improved. We observed increases in all but two types of protections reviewed by Weeden et al. Additionally, we included new protections not reported by Weeden et al. In total, 69.5"],"journal":["Journal of applied behavior analysis"],"pubmed_title":["Protective procedures in functional analysis of self-injurious behavior: An updated scoping review."],"pmcid":["PMC11486563"],"funding_grant_id":["R01 HD076653","GrantR01HD076653"],"pubmed_authors":["Fernandez N","Frank-Crawford MA","Tate SA","Bustamante EA","Piersma DE"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Protective procedures in functional analysis of self-injurious behavior: An updated scoping review.","description":"Despite the efficacy of functional analyses in identifying the function of challenging behavior, clinicians report not always using them, partly due to safety concerns. Understanding how researchers employ safeguards to mitigate risks, particularly with dangerous topographies like self-injurious behavior (SIB), is important to guide research and practice. However, the results of a scoping review of functional analyses of self-injurious behavior conducted by Weeden et al. (2010) revealed that only 19.83% of publications included protections. We extended the work of Weeden et al. to determine whether reporting has improved. We observed increases in all but two types of protections reviewed by Weeden et al. Additionally, we included new protections not reported by Weeden et al. In total, 69.5","dates":{"release":"2024-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2024 Oct Autumn (Fall)","modification":"2026-03-27T17:14:20.231Z","creation":"2025-08-30T03:09:37.326Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC11486563","cross_references":{"pubmed":["39108097"],"doi":["10.1002/jaba.2906"]}}