<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Mai N</submitter><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><pagination>92</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11489574</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>10(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>After disease progression on endocrine therapy (ET) plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor, there is no standardized sequence for subsequent treatment lines for estrogen receptor positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). CDK4/6i retrial as a treatment strategy is commonplace in modern clinical practice; however, the available prospective data investigating this strategy have had inconclusive results. To frame this data in a real-world context, we performed a retrospective analysis assessing the efficacy of CDK4/6is in 195 patients who had previous exposure to CDK4/6i in a prior treatment line at our institution. Among patients who had stopped a CDK4/6i due to toxicity, CDK4/6i retrial either immediately after with a different CDK4/6i or in a further treatment line with the same initial CDK4/6i was b</pubmed_abstract><journal>NPJ breast cancer</journal><pubmed_title>Predictors of response to CDK4/6i retrial after prior CDK4/6i failure in ER+ metastatic breast cancer.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11489574</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P30 CA008748</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Norton L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Razavi P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mai N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Modi S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chandarlapaty S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jhaveri K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dos Anjos CH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Robson M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Drago JZ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dang CT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Patil S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Safonov A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bromberg JF</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Predictors of response to CDK4/6i retrial after prior CDK4/6i failure in ER+ metastatic breast cancer.</name><description>After disease progression on endocrine therapy (ET) plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor, there is no standardized sequence for subsequent treatment lines for estrogen receptor positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). CDK4/6i retrial as a treatment strategy is commonplace in modern clinical practice; however, the available prospective data investigating this strategy have had inconclusive results. To frame this data in a real-world context, we performed a retrospective analysis assessing the efficacy of CDK4/6is in 195 patients who had previous exposure to CDK4/6i in a prior treatment line at our institution. Among patients who had stopped a CDK4/6i due to toxicity, CDK4/6i retrial either immediately after with a different CDK4/6i or in a further treatment line with the same initial CDK4/6i was b</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Oct</publication><modification>2025-04-04T02:54:37.554Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T02:54:37.554Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11489574</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39424631</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41523-024-00699-3</doi></cross_references></HashMap>