{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Veckalov B"],"funding":["Columbia University’s Office for Undergraduate Globe Education","Social Psychology Program, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam","National Science Foundation (NSF)","Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic: e-INFRA CZ project","National Science Foundation"],"pagination":["1892-1905"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11493676"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["8(10)"],"pubmed_abstract":["Communicating the scientific consensus that human-caused climate change is real increases climate change beliefs, worry and support for public action in the United States. In this preregistered experiment, we tested two scientific consensus messages, a classic message on the reality of human-caused climate change and an updated message additionally emphasizing scientific agreement that climate change is a crisis. Across online convenience samples from 27 countries (n = 10,527), the classic message substantially reduces misperceptions (d = 0.47, 95% CI (0.41, 0.52)) and slightly increases climate change beliefs (from d = 0.06, 95% CI (0.01, 0.11) to d = 0.10, 95% CI (0.04, 0.15)) and worry (d = 0.05, 95% CI (-0.01, 0.10)) but not support for public action directly. The updated message is eq"],"journal":["Nature human behaviour"],"pubmed_title":["A 27-country test of communicating the scientific consensus on climate change."],"pmcid":["PMC11493676"],"funding_grant_id":["#2218595"],"pubmed_authors":["Bartos F","Gotz J","Krug A","Paerels C","Aldoh A","Geiger SJ","Jordan G","Bratina Zimic A","Farahat E","Natarajan D","Joustra S","Veckalov B","Schmidt J","Catania A","Papirmeister R","Stablum F","Chorzepa M","Hoter-Ishay B","Akın B","Krajnc Z","Loloff J","Rusyidi B","Wang R","White MP","Vellinho Nardin V","Wattier M","Andersen TL","Niehoff E","Newman-Oktan S","Pohl F","Ruggeri K","Bai J","Peregrina S","Wong CY","van der Linden S","Younssi M","Shavgulidze M","Rutjens BT","Chen A","Klingebiel J","Warner K","Broyles M","Remso A","van Harreveld F","Berglund F","Roh A"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"A 27-country test of communicating the scientific consensus on climate change.","description":"Communicating the scientific consensus that human-caused climate change is real increases climate change beliefs, worry and support for public action in the United States. In this preregistered experiment, we tested two scientific consensus messages, a classic message on the reality of human-caused climate change and an updated message additionally emphasizing scientific agreement that climate change is a crisis. Across online convenience samples from 27 countries (n = 10,527), the classic message substantially reduces misperceptions (d = 0.47, 95% CI (0.41, 0.52)) and slightly increases climate change beliefs (from d = 0.06, 95% CI (0.01, 0.11) to d = 0.10, 95% CI (0.04, 0.15)) and worry (d = 0.05, 95% CI (-0.01, 0.10)) but not support for public action directly. The updated message is eq","dates":{"release":"2024-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2024 Oct","modification":"2025-04-18T14:09:52.966Z","creation":"2025-04-07T00:11:47.902Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC11493676","cross_references":{"pubmed":["39187712"],"doi":["10.1038/s41562-024-01928-2"]}}