<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Veckalov B</submitter><funding>Columbia University’s Office for Undergraduate Globe Education</funding><funding>Social Psychology Program, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam</funding><funding>National Science Foundation (NSF)</funding><funding>Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic: e-INFRA CZ project</funding><funding>National Science Foundation</funding><pagination>1892-1905</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11493676</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>8(10)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Communicating the scientific consensus that human-caused climate change is real increases climate change beliefs, worry and support for public action in the United States. In this preregistered experiment, we tested two scientific consensus messages, a classic message on the reality of human-caused climate change and an updated message additionally emphasizing scientific agreement that climate change is a crisis. Across online convenience samples from 27 countries (n = 10,527), the classic message substantially reduces misperceptions (d = 0.47, 95% CI (0.41, 0.52)) and slightly increases climate change beliefs (from d = 0.06, 95% CI (0.01, 0.11) to d = 0.10, 95% CI (0.04, 0.15)) and worry (d = 0.05, 95% CI (-0.01, 0.10)) but not support for public action directly. The updated message is eq</pubmed_abstract><journal>Nature human behaviour</journal><pubmed_title>A 27-country test of communicating the scientific consensus on climate change.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11493676</pmcid><funding_grant_id>#2218595</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Bartos F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gotz J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Krug A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Paerels C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aldoh A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Geiger SJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jordan G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bratina Zimic A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Farahat E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Natarajan D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Joustra S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Veckalov B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schmidt J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Catania A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Papirmeister R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stablum F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chorzepa M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hoter-Ishay B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Akın B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Krajnc Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Loloff J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rusyidi B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>White MP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vellinho Nardin V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wattier M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Andersen TL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Niehoff E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Newman-Oktan S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pohl F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ruggeri K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bai J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Peregrina S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wong CY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van der Linden S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Younssi M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shavgulidze M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rutjens BT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Klingebiel J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Warner K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Broyles M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Remso A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Harreveld F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Berglund F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roh A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A 27-country test of communicating the scientific consensus on climate change.</name><description>Communicating the scientific consensus that human-caused climate change is real increases climate change beliefs, worry and support for public action in the United States. In this preregistered experiment, we tested two scientific consensus messages, a classic message on the reality of human-caused climate change and an updated message additionally emphasizing scientific agreement that climate change is a crisis. Across online convenience samples from 27 countries (n = 10,527), the classic message substantially reduces misperceptions (d = 0.47, 95% CI (0.41, 0.52)) and slightly increases climate change beliefs (from d = 0.06, 95% CI (0.01, 0.11) to d = 0.10, 95% CI (0.04, 0.15)) and worry (d = 0.05, 95% CI (-0.01, 0.10)) but not support for public action directly. The updated message is eq</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Oct</publication><modification>2025-04-18T14:09:52.966Z</modification><creation>2025-04-07T00:11:47.902Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11493676</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39187712</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41562-024-01928-2</doi></cross_references></HashMap>