<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>16(9)</volume><submitter>Abdelghani R</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) and shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (ssRAB) are minimally invasive technologies for the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has shown to increase diagnostic yield by allowing real-time confirmation of position of lesion and biopsy tool. There is a lack of comparative studies of such platforms using CBCT guidance to overcome computed tomography to body divergence. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic yield of ENB- and ssRAB-guided CBCT for biopsy of pulmonary nodules.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We conducted a retrospective comparative study of consecutive patients undergoing ENB-CBCT and ssRAB-CBCT. Navigational success was defined as biopsy tool within lesion confirmed during CB</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of thoracic disease</journal><pagination>5529-5538</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11494579</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Cone-beam computed tomography-guided shape-sensing robotic bronchoscopy &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;vs.&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy for pulmonary nodules.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11494579</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Espinoza D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abdelghani R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Becnel D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kheir F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Villalobos R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Uribe JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Herr R</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Cone-beam computed tomography-guided shape-sensing robotic bronchoscopy &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;vs.&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy for pulmonary nodules.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) and shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (ssRAB) are minimally invasive technologies for the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has shown to increase diagnostic yield by allowing real-time confirmation of position of lesion and biopsy tool. There is a lack of comparative studies of such platforms using CBCT guidance to overcome computed tomography to body divergence. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic yield of ENB- and ssRAB-guided CBCT for biopsy of pulmonary nodules.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We conducted a retrospective comparative study of consecutive patients undergoing ENB-CBCT and ssRAB-CBCT. Navigational success was defined as biopsy tool within lesion confirmed during CB</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Sep</publication><modification>2025-04-26T00:19:16.658Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T09:40:57.734Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11494579</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39444911</pubmed><doi>10.21037/jtd-24-178</doi></cross_references></HashMap>