<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>15</volume><submitter>Ferreira IA</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Despite being a bacterial pathogen with devastating consequences, &lt;i>Tenacibaculum maritimum&lt;/i>'s pathogenesis is not fully understood. The aim of the present study was to elucidate if different inoculation routes (intraperitoneal - i.p - injection and bath challenge - known to induce mortality) can induce tenacibaculosis (i.e., using the same &lt;i>T. maritimum&lt;/i> inoculum), as well as evaluate the short-term immune response of European sea bass (&lt;i>D. labrax&lt;/i>). Additionally, the host response against i.p. injection of extracellular products (ECPs) was also studied.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Fish were i.p. challenged with 5.5 × 10&lt;sup>5&lt;/sup> CFU mL&lt;sup>-1&lt;/sup> of &lt;i>T. maritimum&lt;/i> cells with or without ECPs (BECPs and BWO, respectively), ECPs alone or marine broth (mock). </pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in immunology</journal><pagination>1478241</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11513285</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>&lt;i>Tenacibaculum maritimum&lt;/i> can boost inflammation in &lt;i>Dicentrarchus labrax&lt;/i> upon peritoneal injection but cannot trigger tenacibaculosis disease.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11513285</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Teixeira C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ferreira IA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Santos P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Costas B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>do Vale A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moxo JS</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>&lt;i>Tenacibaculum maritimum&lt;/i> can boost inflammation in &lt;i>Dicentrarchus labrax&lt;/i> upon peritoneal injection but cannot trigger tenacibaculosis disease.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Despite being a bacterial pathogen with devastating consequences, &lt;i>Tenacibaculum maritimum&lt;/i>'s pathogenesis is not fully understood. The aim of the present study was to elucidate if different inoculation routes (intraperitoneal - i.p - injection and bath challenge - known to induce mortality) can induce tenacibaculosis (i.e., using the same &lt;i>T. maritimum&lt;/i> inoculum), as well as evaluate the short-term immune response of European sea bass (&lt;i>D. labrax&lt;/i>). Additionally, the host response against i.p. injection of extracellular products (ECPs) was also studied.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Fish were i.p. challenged with 5.5 × 10&lt;sup>5&lt;/sup> CFU mL&lt;sup>-1&lt;/sup> of &lt;i>T. maritimum&lt;/i> cells with or without ECPs (BECPs and BWO, respectively), ECPs alone or marine broth (mock). </description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024</publication><modification>2026-07-15T14:48:05.863Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T14:25:10.467Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11513285</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39469720</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fimmu.2024.1478241</doi></cross_references></HashMap>