<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Daas MC</submitter><funding>World Cancer Research Fund</funding><funding>Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport</funding><funding>ZonMw</funding><funding>European Commission</funding><pagination>2957-2973</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11519232</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>63(8)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Investigate the associations of ultra-processed foods (UPF) in healthful (hPDI) and unhealthful (uPDI) plant-based diets with all-cause mortality, greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE), and blue water consumption (BWC).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Analyses were based on 35,030 participants (20-70 years; 74% females) from the EPIC-NL cohort who were followed up from 1993 to 1997 through 2014. Plant-based diet indices (hPDI and uPDI) and UPF consumption were calculated from a validated FFQ, assessed at baseline. Cox proportional hazard and multiple linear regression models were used to estimate associations between combined quartiles of the PDI indices and UPF consumption.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>With lower hPDI and higher UPF diets as the reference, we observed the following. Risk estimates of all-cause mortality were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.83, 1.16) for lower UPF consumption, 0.86 (95% CI: 0.68, 1.08) for higher hPDI, and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.89) for combined higher hPDI and lower UPF consumption. Results with the uPDI were inconclusive. Mean differences in GHGE and BWC were 1.4% (95% CI: 0.3, 2.4) and 1.6% (95% CI: -0.5, 3.7) for lower UPF consumption, -7.4% (95% CI: -8.6, -6.4) and 9.6% (95% CI: 7.2, 12.0) for higher hPDI, and - 6.8% (95% CI: -7.4, -6.1) and 13.1% (95% CI: 11.6, 14.8) for combined higher hPDI and lower UPF consumption. No apparent conflict between environmental impacts was observed for the uPDI; GHGE and BWC were lower for higher uPDI scores.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Mortality risk and environmental impacts were mostly associated with the amount of plant-based foods and to a lesser extent UPF in the diet. Shifting to a more healthful plant-based diet could improve human health and reduce most aspects of environmental impact (GHGE, but not BWC) irrespective of UPF consumption.</pubmed_abstract><journal>European journal of nutrition</journal><pubmed_title>The role of ultra-processed foods in plant-based diets: associations with human health and environmental sustainability.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11519232</pmcid><funding_grant_id>World Cancer Research Fund</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>ZonMw</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>European Commission</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Pinho MGM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Biesbroek S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vellinga RE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Verschuren WMM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Boer JMA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van der Schouw YT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Van't Veer P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Daas MC</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The role of ultra-processed foods in plant-based diets: associations with human health and environmental sustainability.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Investigate the associations of ultra-processed foods (UPF) in healthful (hPDI) and unhealthful (uPDI) plant-based diets with all-cause mortality, greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE), and blue water consumption (BWC).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Analyses were based on 35,030 participants (20-70 years; 74% females) from the EPIC-NL cohort who were followed up from 1993 to 1997 through 2014. Plant-based diet indices (hPDI and uPDI) and UPF consumption were calculated from a validated FFQ, assessed at baseline. Cox proportional hazard and multiple linear regression models were used to estimate associations between combined quartiles of the PDI indices and UPF consumption.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>With lower hPDI and higher UPF diets as the reference, we observed the following. Risk estimates of all-cause mortality were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.83, 1.16) for lower UPF consumption, 0.86 (95% CI: 0.68, 1.08) for higher hPDI, and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.89) for combined higher hPDI and lower UPF consumption. Results with the uPDI were inconclusive. Mean differences in GHGE and BWC were 1.4% (95% CI: 0.3, 2.4) and 1.6% (95% CI: -0.5, 3.7) for lower UPF consumption, -7.4% (95% CI: -8.6, -6.4) and 9.6% (95% CI: 7.2, 12.0) for higher hPDI, and - 6.8% (95% CI: -7.4, -6.1) and 13.1% (95% CI: 11.6, 14.8) for combined higher hPDI and lower UPF consumption. No apparent conflict between environmental impacts was observed for the uPDI; GHGE and BWC were lower for higher uPDI scores.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Mortality risk and environmental impacts were mostly associated with the amount of plant-based foods and to a lesser extent UPF in the diet. Shifting to a more healthful plant-based diet could improve human health and reduce most aspects of environmental impact (GHGE, but not BWC) irrespective of UPF consumption.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Dec</publication><modification>2025-04-26T17:06:24.449Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T15:24:01.333Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11519232</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39180555</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s00394-024-03477-w</doi></cross_references></HashMap>