<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>5(9)</volume><submitter>Bergquist JA</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Artificial intelligence-machine learning (AI-ML) has demonstrated the ability to extract clinically useful information from electrocardiograms (ECGs) not available using traditional interpretation methods. There exists an extensive body of AI-ML research in fields outside of cardiology including several open-source AI-ML architectures that can be translated to new problems in an "off-the-shelf" manner.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>We sought to address the limited investigation of which if any of these off-the-shelf architectures could be useful in ECG analysis as well as how and when these AI-ML approaches fail.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We applied 6 off-the-shelf AI-ML architectures to detect low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in a cohort of ECGs from 24,868 patients. We assessed L</pubmed_abstract><journal>Heart rhythm O2</journal><pagination>644-654</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11524967</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Performance of off-the-shelf machine learning architectures and biases in low left ventricular ejection fraction detection.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11524967</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Bergquist JA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>MacLeod RS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brundage J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Torre M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shah R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bunch TJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Steinberg BA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lyons A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zenger B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ye X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tasdizen T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ranjan R</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Performance of off-the-shelf machine learning architectures and biases in low left ventricular ejection fraction detection.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Artificial intelligence-machine learning (AI-ML) has demonstrated the ability to extract clinically useful information from electrocardiograms (ECGs) not available using traditional interpretation methods. There exists an extensive body of AI-ML research in fields outside of cardiology including several open-source AI-ML architectures that can be translated to new problems in an "off-the-shelf" manner.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>We sought to address the limited investigation of which if any of these off-the-shelf architectures could be useful in ECG analysis as well as how and when these AI-ML approaches fail.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We applied 6 off-the-shelf AI-ML architectures to detect low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in a cohort of ECGs from 24,868 patients. We assessed L</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Sep</publication><modification>2025-04-26T16:59:48.799Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T15:25:18.325Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11524967</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39493911</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.009</doi></cross_references></HashMap>