{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["16"],"submitter":["Ali SH"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Introduction</h4>Acute subdural hematomas are major causes of morbidity which warrant immediate treatment. If surgical intervention is warranted, craniotomy (CO) and decompressive craniectomy (DC) are employed, largely based on a loosely defined criteria and the neurosurgeon's best judgment. The primacy of one approach over another is a matter of dispute.<h4>Objective</h4>We attempt to further clarify any advantages in the two techniques, and include a propensity score matched (PSM) subgroup analysis to eliminate bias.<h4>Design</h4>This meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.<h4>Data sources and methods</h4>A literature review was conducted on PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar f"],"journal":["Journal of central nervous system disease"],"pagination":["11795735241297250"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11533180"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy for acute subdural hematoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis with an adjusted subgroup analysis."],"pmcid":["PMC11533180"],"pubmed_authors":["Munaf U","Qazi SU","Marsia S","Iqbal F","Haque IU","Abdullah A","Khalid A","Usman M","Sadiq M","Siddiqui AA","Ali SH","Tharwani ZH","Ansari HUH"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy for acute subdural hematoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis with an adjusted subgroup analysis.","description":"<h4>Introduction</h4>Acute subdural hematomas are major causes of morbidity which warrant immediate treatment. If surgical intervention is warranted, craniotomy (CO) and decompressive craniectomy (DC) are employed, largely based on a loosely defined criteria and the neurosurgeon's best judgment. The primacy of one approach over another is a matter of dispute.<h4>Objective</h4>We attempt to further clarify any advantages in the two techniques, and include a propensity score matched (PSM) subgroup analysis to eliminate bias.<h4>Design</h4>This meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.<h4>Data sources and methods</h4>A literature review was conducted on PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar f","dates":{"release":"2024-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2024","modification":"2025-04-04T07:27:51.614Z","creation":"2025-04-04T07:27:51.614Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC11533180","cross_references":{"pubmed":["39497937"],"doi":["10.1177/11795735241297250"]}}