<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>10</volume><submitter>Cossart AR</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Direct-to-consumer (DTC) electronic prescription services (EPS) are a novel addition to the Australian healthcare landscape. This study aimed to explore consumers' perceptions on how this model of care supports the delivery of best-practice care.&lt;h4>Method&lt;/h4>Focus groups participants were recruited through social media and included adults aged 18 years or older, Queensland (Australia) residents, and interested in DTC EPS. Focus groups were conducted via Zoom&lt;sup>®&lt;/sup> and repeated until data saturation. Inductive thematic analysis was undertaken to elicit consumer perception themes from focus group discussions and field notes.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Three focus groups were conducted between July and August 2022 and included 13 participants of which two (15%) had previously used DTC EPS. Four major perception themes were induced: (a) Consumer responsibility. There is an assumed level of consumer health literacy leading to an unacceptable burden of responsibility on the patient; (b) System processes appear to be underdeveloped to support best-practice care; (c) Access to convenient and timely healthcare will be improved for many patients, however, out of pocket expenses may promote inequity; and (d) Service model improvements can address safety and quality concerns including integration of the model within existing national digital health platforms.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Participants believed that DTC EPS was a valuable addition to the Australian health care landscape increasing convenient and timely access to medicines for consumers. Participants were concerned that a heavy reliance on health literacy and underdeveloped system processes may lead to unsafe prescribing.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Digital health</journal><pagination>20552076241294184</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11544656</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Consumer perceptions of direct-to-consumer electronic prescription services in Queensland, Australia.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11544656</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Cossart AR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kennedy E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Freeman CR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hillen JB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yong FR</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Consumer perceptions of direct-to-consumer electronic prescription services in Queensland, Australia.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Direct-to-consumer (DTC) electronic prescription services (EPS) are a novel addition to the Australian healthcare landscape. This study aimed to explore consumers' perceptions on how this model of care supports the delivery of best-practice care.&lt;h4>Method&lt;/h4>Focus groups participants were recruited through social media and included adults aged 18 years or older, Queensland (Australia) residents, and interested in DTC EPS. Focus groups were conducted via Zoom&lt;sup>®&lt;/sup> and repeated until data saturation. Inductive thematic analysis was undertaken to elicit consumer perception themes from focus group discussions and field notes.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Three focus groups were conducted between July and August 2022 and included 13 participants of which two (15%) had previously used DTC EPS. Four major perception themes were induced: (a) Consumer responsibility. There is an assumed level of consumer health literacy leading to an unacceptable burden of responsibility on the patient; (b) System processes appear to be underdeveloped to support best-practice care; (c) Access to convenient and timely healthcare will be improved for many patients, however, out of pocket expenses may promote inequity; and (d) Service model improvements can address safety and quality concerns including integration of the model within existing national digital health platforms.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Participants believed that DTC EPS was a valuable addition to the Australian health care landscape increasing convenient and timely access to medicines for consumers. Participants were concerned that a heavy reliance on health literacy and underdeveloped system processes may lead to unsafe prescribing.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Jan-Dec</publication><modification>2025-04-22T16:07:46.453Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T01:42:32.503Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11544656</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39525558</pubmed><doi>10.1177/20552076241294184</doi></cross_references></HashMap>