{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Leitao TP"],"funding":["CTC-OD project","Palmela Leitão Urologia Lda"],"pagination":["3601"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11545310"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["16(21)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) may be the missing renal cell carcinoma (RCC) biomarker. No-touch (NT) resection has shown benefit in several tumors.<h4>Methods</h4>A randomized controlled trial comparing CTC and circulating mesenchymal cell (CMC) release in no-touch (NT) vs. conventional (C) laparoscopic RN. Blood samples were collected at operation room arrival (S0), specimen extraction (S1), postoperative D1, and D30. CTCs were isolated and analyzed using RUBYchip™.<h4>Results</h4>Thirty-four patients were included. No significant differences were found between groups in CTC and CMC counts, count variations between time points, complications, and survival. The total circulating cell detection rates in the NT, C, and overall RCC groups were 58.3%, 80.0%, and 70.4% at S0"],"journal":["Cancers"],"pubmed_title":["A Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Release of Circulating Tumor and Mesenchymal Cells in No-Touch Radical Nephrectomy."],"pmcid":["PMC11545310"],"funding_grant_id":["No grant number"],"pubmed_authors":["Piairo P","Antunes M","Kucharczak S","Peixoto S","Dieguez L","Rodrigues C","Lopes T","Costa L","Miranda M","Cavaco A","Leitao TP","Dos Reis JP","Corredeira P"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"A Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Release of Circulating Tumor and Mesenchymal Cells in No-Touch Radical Nephrectomy.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) may be the missing renal cell carcinoma (RCC) biomarker. No-touch (NT) resection has shown benefit in several tumors.<h4>Methods</h4>A randomized controlled trial comparing CTC and circulating mesenchymal cell (CMC) release in no-touch (NT) vs. conventional (C) laparoscopic RN. Blood samples were collected at operation room arrival (S0), specimen extraction (S1), postoperative D1, and D30. CTCs were isolated and analyzed using RUBYchip™.<h4>Results</h4>Thirty-four patients were included. No significant differences were found between groups in CTC and CMC counts, count variations between time points, complications, and survival. The total circulating cell detection rates in the NT, C, and overall RCC groups were 58.3%, 80.0%, and 70.4% at S0","dates":{"release":"2024-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2024 Oct","modification":"2025-04-04T18:56:22.523Z","creation":"2025-04-04T18:56:22.523Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC11545310","cross_references":{"pubmed":["39518041"],"doi":["10.3390/cancers16213601"]}}