<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>16(21)</volume><submitter>Salciccia S</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;b>Background&lt;/b>: The advantage of a robotic-assisted (RARP) over a laparoscopic (LRP) approach in radical prostatectomy (RP) remains to be demonstrated. &lt;b>Aim&lt;/b>: The aim of the study is to use a homogeneous population in real life and single primary surgeon surgery to analyze the oncological and functional results based on the type of surgical approach and pathological features. &lt;b>Methods&lt;/b>: This is a prospective trial on non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) patients considered after a multidisciplinary decision to conduct a RP, using a RARP or LRP approach. A real-life setting was analyzed at our Urological Departments using homogeneous criteria for the management of PCa cases and a single surgeon experience on 444 cases (284 LRP and 160 RARP). &lt;b>Results&lt;/b>: Mean operating time </pubmed_abstract><journal>Cancers</journal><pagination>3604</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11545600</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Real-Life Comparative Analysis of Robotic-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a Single Centre Experience.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11545600</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Salciccia S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bevilacqua G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Panebianco V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Corvino R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Magliocca FM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Frisenda M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Santini D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Di Lascio G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gentilucci A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sciarra A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Basile G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Franco G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Santarelli V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Di Civita MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Santodirocco L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gobbi L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rosati D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Forte F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moriconi M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Del Giudice F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Scornajenghi CM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Di Pierro GB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brunelli V</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Real-Life Comparative Analysis of Robotic-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a Single Centre Experience.</name><description>&lt;b>Background&lt;/b>: The advantage of a robotic-assisted (RARP) over a laparoscopic (LRP) approach in radical prostatectomy (RP) remains to be demonstrated. &lt;b>Aim&lt;/b>: The aim of the study is to use a homogeneous population in real life and single primary surgeon surgery to analyze the oncological and functional results based on the type of surgical approach and pathological features. &lt;b>Methods&lt;/b>: This is a prospective trial on non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) patients considered after a multidisciplinary decision to conduct a RP, using a RARP or LRP approach. A real-life setting was analyzed at our Urological Departments using homogeneous criteria for the management of PCa cases and a single surgeon experience on 444 cases (284 LRP and 160 RARP). &lt;b>Results&lt;/b>: Mean operating time </description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Oct</publication><modification>2026-07-09T13:19:02.673Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T02:54:16.525Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11545600</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39518044</pubmed><doi>10.3390/cancers16213604</doi></cross_references></HashMap>