<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>25(21)</volume><submitter>Lin SY</submitter><pubmed_abstract>The ubiquitin receptors RPN10 and RPN13 harbor multiple activities including ubiquitin binding; however, solid evidence connecting a particular activity to specific in vivo functions is scarce. Through complementation, the ubiquitin-binding site-truncated Arabidopsis RPN10 (N215) rescued the growth defects of &lt;i>rpn10-2&lt;/i>, supporting the idea that the ubiquitin-binding ability of RPN10 is dispensable and N215, which harbors a vWA domain, is fully functional. Instead, a structural role played by RPN10 in the 26S proteasomes is likely vital in vivo. A site-specific variant, RPN10-11A, that likely has a destabilized vWA domain could partially rescue the &lt;i>rpn10-2&lt;/i> growth defects and is not integrated into 26S proteasomes. Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry with &lt;i>rpn10-2&lt;/i> 26S proteasomes showed that the loss of RPN10 reduced the abundance of double-capped proteasomes, induced the integration of specific subunit paralogues, and increased the association of ECM29, a well-known factor critical for quality checkpoints by binding and inhibiting aberrant proteasomes. Extensive Y2H and GST-pulldown analyses identified RPN2-binding residues on RPN13 that overlapped with ubiquitin-binding and UCH2-binding sites in the RPN13 C-terminus (246-254). Interestingly, an analysis of homozygous &lt;i>rpn10-2&lt;/i> segregation in a &lt;i>rpn13-1&lt;/i> background harboring RPN13 variants defective for ubiquitin binding and/or RPN2 binding supports the criticality of the RPN13-RPN2 association in vivo.</pubmed_abstract><journal>International journal of molecular sciences</journal><pagination>11650</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11546751</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>The Structural Role of RPN10 in the 26S Proteasome and an RPN2-Binding Residue on RPN13 Are Functionally Important in Arabidopsis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11546751</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Fu H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lin YL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Usharani R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Radjacommare R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lin SY</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The Structural Role of RPN10 in the 26S Proteasome and an RPN2-Binding Residue on RPN13 Are Functionally Important in Arabidopsis.</name><description>The ubiquitin receptors RPN10 and RPN13 harbor multiple activities including ubiquitin binding; however, solid evidence connecting a particular activity to specific in vivo functions is scarce. Through complementation, the ubiquitin-binding site-truncated Arabidopsis RPN10 (N215) rescued the growth defects of &lt;i>rpn10-2&lt;/i>, supporting the idea that the ubiquitin-binding ability of RPN10 is dispensable and N215, which harbors a vWA domain, is fully functional. Instead, a structural role played by RPN10 in the 26S proteasomes is likely vital in vivo. A site-specific variant, RPN10-11A, that likely has a destabilized vWA domain could partially rescue the &lt;i>rpn10-2&lt;/i> growth defects and is not integrated into 26S proteasomes. Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry with &lt;i>rpn10-2&lt;/i> 26S proteasomes showed that the loss of RPN10 reduced the abundance of double-capped proteasomes, induced the integration of specific subunit paralogues, and increased the association of ECM29, a well-known factor critical for quality checkpoints by binding and inhibiting aberrant proteasomes. Extensive Y2H and GST-pulldown analyses identified RPN2-binding residues on RPN13 that overlapped with ubiquitin-binding and UCH2-binding sites in the RPN13 C-terminus (246-254). Interestingly, an analysis of homozygous &lt;i>rpn10-2&lt;/i> segregation in a &lt;i>rpn13-1&lt;/i> background harboring RPN13 variants defective for ubiquitin binding and/or RPN2 binding supports the criticality of the RPN13-RPN2 association in vivo.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Oct</publication><modification>2026-07-12T03:13:15.308Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T18:55:41.002Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11546751</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39519207</pubmed><doi>10.3390/ijms252111650</doi></cross_references></HashMap>