<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>15(1)</volume><submitter>Yue C</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Unleashing the land sector's potential for climate mitigation requires purpose-driven changes in land management. However, contributions of past management changes to the current global and regional carbon cycles remain unclear. Here, we use vegetation modelling to reveal how a portfolio of ecological restoration policies has impacted China's terrestrial carbon balance through developing counterfactual 'no-policy' scenarios. Pursuing conventional policies and assuming no changes in climate or atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub>) since 1980 would have led China's land sector to be a carbon source of 0.11 Pg C yr&lt;sup>-1&lt;/sup> for 2001-2020, in stark contrast to a sink of 175.9 Tg C yr&lt;sup>-1&lt;/sup> in reality. About 72.7% of this difference can be attributed to land management changes,</pubmed_abstract><journal>Nature communications</journal><pagination>9708</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11550817</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Contributions of ecological restoration policies to China's land carbon balance.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11550817</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Xu M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ciais P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Piao S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>He J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xu C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Deng L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shen H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yue C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhu L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tao S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leng Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chang J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhao J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Contributions of ecological restoration policies to China's land carbon balance.</name><description>Unleashing the land sector's potential for climate mitigation requires purpose-driven changes in land management. However, contributions of past management changes to the current global and regional carbon cycles remain unclear. Here, we use vegetation modelling to reveal how a portfolio of ecological restoration policies has impacted China's terrestrial carbon balance through developing counterfactual 'no-policy' scenarios. Pursuing conventional policies and assuming no changes in climate or atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub>) since 1980 would have led China's land sector to be a carbon source of 0.11 Pg C yr&lt;sup>-1&lt;/sup> for 2001-2020, in stark contrast to a sink of 175.9 Tg C yr&lt;sup>-1&lt;/sup> in reality. About 72.7% of this difference can be attributed to land management changes,</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Nov</publication><modification>2025-04-04T00:33:06.758Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T00:33:06.758Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11550817</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39521789</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41467-024-54100-9</doi></cross_references></HashMap>