<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>20(22)</volume><submitter>Cardaioli F</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>In patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), the presence of a low-flow, low-gradient (LFLG) status has been associated with higher mortality at short-term follow-up.&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>We aimed to evaluate long-term survival after TAVI in patients with classical (cLFLG) and paradoxical LFLG (pLFLG) aortic stenosis (AS) compared to high-gradient (HG)-AS.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Patients undergoing TAVI at our centre with a hypothetical minimum 5-year follow-up were divided into 3 groups: (1) HG-AS (mean gradient [MG] >40 mmHg), (2) cLFLG-AS (MG &lt;40 mmHg, ejection fraction [EF] &lt;50%), and (3) pLFLG-AS (MG &lt;40 mmHg, EF ≥50%). The primary endpoint of the study was all-cause mortality. Propensity score-weighted survival analysis was performed to adjust for possible</pubmed_abstract><journal>EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology</journal><pagination>1380-1389</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11556328</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Long-term survival after TAVI in low-flow, low-gradient aortic valve stenosis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11556328</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Fovino LN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Arturi F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fabris T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bertolini A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Napodano M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fraccaro C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tarantini G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Continisio S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cardaioli F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lorenzoni G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gregori D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rodino G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Masiero G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Panza A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Long-term survival after TAVI in low-flow, low-gradient aortic valve stenosis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>In patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), the presence of a low-flow, low-gradient (LFLG) status has been associated with higher mortality at short-term follow-up.&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>We aimed to evaluate long-term survival after TAVI in patients with classical (cLFLG) and paradoxical LFLG (pLFLG) aortic stenosis (AS) compared to high-gradient (HG)-AS.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Patients undergoing TAVI at our centre with a hypothetical minimum 5-year follow-up were divided into 3 groups: (1) HG-AS (mean gradient [MG] >40 mmHg), (2) cLFLG-AS (MG &lt;40 mmHg, ejection fraction [EF] &lt;50%), and (3) pLFLG-AS (MG &lt;40 mmHg, EF ≥50%). The primary endpoint of the study was all-cause mortality. Propensity score-weighted survival analysis was performed to adjust for possible</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Nov</publication><modification>2026-06-09T05:39:44.158Z</modification><creation>2026-06-09T03:07:54.769Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11556328</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39552481</pubmed><doi>10.4244/eij-d-24-00442</doi><doi>10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00442</doi></cross_references></HashMap>