<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Hays RD</submitter><funding>AHRQ HHS</funding><pagination>23743735241297622</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11565615</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>11</volume><pubmed_abstract>Completing self-administered patient experience surveys is challenging for many patients. We randomized adult patients receiving care from an urban safety net provider to complete the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS&lt;sup>®&lt;/sup>) Clinician and Group Survey 3.1 (CG-CAHPS 3.1), or an "EZ" survey created using plain language principles. We compared response rates, item missingness, item-scale correlations, and reliability of patient experience scores based on 264 completed surveys (64% female, 66% Hispanic, 33% high school education or less). The CG-CAHPS 3.1 survey response rate was higher (20% vs 16%), and failure to follow skip instructions was more common for the EZ survey. Internal consistency reliability for multi-item scales was similar, but provider-level</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of patient experience</journal><pubmed_title>Does an "EZ" Survey Improve the Data Quality of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;®&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) Clinician and Group Survey 3.1?</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11565615</pmcid><funding_grant_id>U18 HS029321</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Quigley DD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hays RD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brown JA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mikail C</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Does an "EZ" Survey Improve the Data Quality of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;®&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) Clinician and Group Survey 3.1?</name><description>Completing self-administered patient experience surveys is challenging for many patients. We randomized adult patients receiving care from an urban safety net provider to complete the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS&lt;sup>®&lt;/sup>) Clinician and Group Survey 3.1 (CG-CAHPS 3.1), or an "EZ" survey created using plain language principles. We compared response rates, item missingness, item-scale correlations, and reliability of patient experience scores based on 264 completed surveys (64% female, 66% Hispanic, 33% high school education or less). The CG-CAHPS 3.1 survey response rate was higher (20% vs 16%), and failure to follow skip instructions was more common for the EZ survey. Internal consistency reliability for multi-item scales was similar, but provider-level</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024</publication><modification>2026-07-17T00:05:00.095Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T22:10:34.443Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11565615</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39553387</pubmed><doi>10.1177/23743735241297622</doi></cross_references></HashMap>