<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Yuan Y</submitter><funding>Sun Yat-Sen University Clinical Research 5010 Programme</funding><funding>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding><pagination>1337-1349</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11570767</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>44(11)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The widely accepted view that portal hypertension (PHT) is a contraindication to hepatectomy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is being increasingly challenged. The long-term survival outcomes and safety of partial hepatectomy versus interventional treatment using ablation with or without pre-ablation transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with HBV-related HCC within the Milan criteria and with clinically significant PHT were compared in this study.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted on consecutive patients with clinically PHT and hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related HCC with tumors which were within the Milan criteria. These patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either partial hepatectomy or interventional trea</pubmed_abstract><journal>Cancer communications (London, England)</journal><pubmed_title>Partial hepatectomy versus interventional treatment in patients with hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma and clinically significant portal hypertension: a randomized comparative clinical trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11570767</pmcid><funding_grant_id>No. 82272887</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>2012010</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Peng H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Qiu J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zheng Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>He W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zou R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lau WY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yuan Y</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Partial hepatectomy versus interventional treatment in patients with hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma and clinically significant portal hypertension: a randomized comparative clinical trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The widely accepted view that portal hypertension (PHT) is a contraindication to hepatectomy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is being increasingly challenged. The long-term survival outcomes and safety of partial hepatectomy versus interventional treatment using ablation with or without pre-ablation transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with HBV-related HCC within the Milan criteria and with clinically significant PHT were compared in this study.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted on consecutive patients with clinically PHT and hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related HCC with tumors which were within the Milan criteria. These patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either partial hepatectomy or interventional trea</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Nov</publication><modification>2026-07-15T04:58:55.256Z</modification><creation>2025-04-21T21:45:48.286Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11570767</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39322951</pubmed><doi>10.1002/cac2.12614</doi></cross_references></HashMap>