<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><submitter>Romoli M</submitter><funding>Bando Ricerca Corrente</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Data on safety and efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke in older patients are limited and controversial, and people aged 80 or older were under-represented in randomized trials. Our aim was to assess EVT effect for ischemic stroke patients aged ⩾80 at a nationwide level.&lt;h4>Patients and methods&lt;/h4>The cohort included stroke patients undergoing EVT from the Italian Registry of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke (IRETAS). Patients were a priori divided into younger and older groups (&lt;80 vs ⩾80). Primary outcome was good functional outcome (modified Rankin scale, mRS, 0-2 at 90 days). Secondary outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), successful reperfusion, EVT abortion. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed </pubmed_abstract><journal>European stroke journal</journal><pagination>23969873241299335</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11579997</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Stroke thrombectomy in the elderly: A propensity score matched study on a nationwide real-world registry.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11579997</pmcid><pubmed_authors>La Spina P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Russo M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bracco S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Giossi A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pezzini A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Giannini N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Plebani M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cerrato P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ferrandi D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Naldi A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dall'Ora E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Castellano D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tassi R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Saia V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Loizzo ND</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nappini S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cavasin N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fainardi E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Toni D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Critelli A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cirillo L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Burdi N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mannino M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Romano D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mangiafico S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Boero G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Migliaccio L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Amista P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Besana M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bigliardi G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gallesio I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Limbucci N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nencini P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Casalena A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nicolini E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rizzo A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zimatore S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Benzi Markushi T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tassinari T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Castellan L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pracucci G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vinci SL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bergui M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Puglielli E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sallustio F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Orlandi B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Saletti A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Invernizzi P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Filauri P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Paladini A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ivaldi D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Petruzzellis M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pavia M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Casetta I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zini A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vallone S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lazzarotti GA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Filizzolo M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Azzini C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Biraschi F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Romoli M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Frauenfelder G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Diomedi M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ruggiero M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Menozzi R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Comai A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Forlivesi S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Da Ros V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cappellari M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Stroke thrombectomy in the elderly: A propensity score matched study on a nationwide real-world registry.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Data on safety and efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke in older patients are limited and controversial, and people aged 80 or older were under-represented in randomized trials. Our aim was to assess EVT effect for ischemic stroke patients aged ⩾80 at a nationwide level.&lt;h4>Patients and methods&lt;/h4>The cohort included stroke patients undergoing EVT from the Italian Registry of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke (IRETAS). Patients were a priori divided into younger and older groups (&lt;80 vs ⩾80). Primary outcome was good functional outcome (modified Rankin scale, mRS, 0-2 at 90 days). Secondary outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), successful reperfusion, EVT abortion. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed </description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Nov</publication><modification>2025-04-04T13:41:01.652Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T13:41:01.652Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11579997</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39565035</pubmed><doi>10.1177/23969873241299335</doi></cross_references></HashMap>