<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>56(6)</volume><submitter>van Toledo DEFWM</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Recent studies demonstrated that a higher proximal serrated polyp detection rate (PSPDR) among endoscopists is associated with a lower risk of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) incidence and death for their patients. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of an e-learning resource on PSPDR.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We performed a multicenter randomized controlled trial within the Dutch fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program. Endoscopists were randomized using block randomization per center to either receive a 60-minute e-learning resource on serrated polyp detection or not. PSPDR was calculated based on all colonoscopies performed during a 27-month pre-intervention and a 17-month post-intervention period. The primary end point was difference in PSPDR between intervention and control arms (intention to treat) using mixed effect logistic regression modeling, with time (pre-intervention/post-intervention) and interaction between time and arm (intervention/control) as fixed effects, and endoscopists as random effects.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>116 endoscopists (57 intervention, 59 controls) were included, and performed 27494 and 33888 colonoscopies, respectively. Median PSPDR pre-intervention was 13.6% (95%CI 13.0-14.1) in the intervention arm and 13.8% (95%CI 13.3-14.3) in controls. Post-intervention PSPDR was significantly higher over time in the intervention arm than in controls (17.1% vs. 15.4%, P=0.01).&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>In an era of increased awareness and increasing PSPDRs, endoscopists who undertook a one-time e-learning course significantly accelerated the increase in PSPDR compared with endoscopists who did not undertake the e-learning. Widespread implementation might reduce PCCRC incidence.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Endoscopy</journal><pagination>412-420</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11583003</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Effect of an E-learning resource on endoscopists' proximal serrated polyp detection rate: a randomized controlled trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11583003</pmcid><pubmed_authors>IJspeert JEG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Toledo DEFWM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bleijenberg AGC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Depla A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dekker E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Montazeri NSM</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Effect of an E-learning resource on endoscopists' proximal serrated polyp detection rate: a randomized controlled trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Recent studies demonstrated that a higher proximal serrated polyp detection rate (PSPDR) among endoscopists is associated with a lower risk of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) incidence and death for their patients. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of an e-learning resource on PSPDR.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We performed a multicenter randomized controlled trial within the Dutch fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program. Endoscopists were randomized using block randomization per center to either receive a 60-minute e-learning resource on serrated polyp detection or not. PSPDR was calculated based on all colonoscopies performed during a 27-month pre-intervention and a 17-month post-intervention period. The primary end point was difference in PSPDR between intervention and control arms (intention to treat) using mixed effect logistic regression modeling, with time (pre-intervention/post-intervention) and interaction between time and arm (intervention/control) as fixed effects, and endoscopists as random effects.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>116 endoscopists (57 intervention, 59 controls) were included, and performed 27494 and 33888 colonoscopies, respectively. Median PSPDR pre-intervention was 13.6% (95%CI 13.0-14.1) in the intervention arm and 13.8% (95%CI 13.3-14.3) in controls. Post-intervention PSPDR was significantly higher over time in the intervention arm than in controls (17.1% vs. 15.4%, P=0.01).&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>In an era of increased awareness and increasing PSPDRs, endoscopists who undertook a one-time e-learning course significantly accelerated the increase in PSPDR compared with endoscopists who did not undertake the e-learning. Widespread implementation might reduce PCCRC incidence.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Jun</publication><modification>2025-04-22T02:41:40.288Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T20:28:13.903Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11583003</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38191001</pubmed><doi>10.1055/a-2240-7823</doi></cross_references></HashMap>