<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>23(2)</volume><submitter>Nath A</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>Telemedicine has emerged as a promising solution for enhancing Type 2 diabetes management, which aims to reduce healthcare costs and improve patient outcomes. Despite its potential benefits for diabetes management in India, knowledge of its clinical effectiveness is scarce. This meta-analysis examines the clinical effectiveness of telemedicine versus physical consultation in managing Type 2 diabetes in India.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>The meta-analysis adhered to the PRISMA-P guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023400562). PubMed and EMBASE were searched for eligible studies from 1st January 2012 to 30th June 2022. Included were studies on Type 2 diabetes patients in India comparing telemedicine (Intervention) with physical consultation (conventional) regarding effect on HbA1c changes. Risk of bias for randomised studies of Intervention (RoB-2) was used for study quality assessment.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>We found four articles that met the eligibility criteria, all reporting quantitative HbA1c change. The telemedicine interventions included video consultation, health systemcomputer-generated telephonic messages and a Video-Based Lifestyle Education Programme. Upon pooling the results from these studies, an overall analysis indicated a non-statistically significant reduction in HbA1c levels following the intervention compared to conventional treatment (pooled difference in means = -0.03, 95% CI = -0.23 to 0.17, Z = 0.30 &lt;i>P&lt;/i> = 0.76). Likewise, there was no statistically significant difference in secondary outcomes (Body Mass Index, body weight and lipid profile) between both treatment groups.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Enhancing telemedicine approaches may hold promise in improving type 2 diabetes management in India, although the existing evidence remains inconclusive. Further research involving long-term telemedicine interventions would help to provide more substantial evidence on the clinical effectiveness of telemedicine for Type 2 diabetes management in India.&lt;h4>Supplementary information&lt;/h4>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-024-01471-x.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders</journal><pagination>2095-2104</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11599547</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>The clinical effectiveness of telemedicine for managing type 2 diabetes in India: a meta-analysis of the impact of telemedicine with clinic visits.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11599547</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Thadi Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pant A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nath A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mathew S</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The clinical effectiveness of telemedicine for managing type 2 diabetes in India: a meta-analysis of the impact of telemedicine with clinic visits.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>Telemedicine has emerged as a promising solution for enhancing Type 2 diabetes management, which aims to reduce healthcare costs and improve patient outcomes. Despite its potential benefits for diabetes management in India, knowledge of its clinical effectiveness is scarce. This meta-analysis examines the clinical effectiveness of telemedicine versus physical consultation in managing Type 2 diabetes in India.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>The meta-analysis adhered to the PRISMA-P guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023400562). PubMed and EMBASE were searched for eligible studies from 1st January 2012 to 30th June 2022. Included were studies on Type 2 diabetes patients in India comparing telemedicine (Intervention) with physical consultation (conventional) regarding effect on HbA1c changes. Risk of bias for randomised studies of Intervention (RoB-2) was used for study quality assessment.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>We found four articles that met the eligibility criteria, all reporting quantitative HbA1c change. The telemedicine interventions included video consultation, health systemcomputer-generated telephonic messages and a Video-Based Lifestyle Education Programme. Upon pooling the results from these studies, an overall analysis indicated a non-statistically significant reduction in HbA1c levels following the intervention compared to conventional treatment (pooled difference in means = -0.03, 95% CI = -0.23 to 0.17, Z = 0.30 &lt;i>P&lt;/i> = 0.76). Likewise, there was no statistically significant difference in secondary outcomes (Body Mass Index, body weight and lipid profile) between both treatment groups.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Enhancing telemedicine approaches may hold promise in improving type 2 diabetes management in India, although the existing evidence remains inconclusive. Further research involving long-term telemedicine interventions would help to provide more substantial evidence on the clinical effectiveness of telemedicine for Type 2 diabetes management in India.&lt;h4>Supplementary information&lt;/h4>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-024-01471-x.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Dec</publication><modification>2026-03-15T17:18:18.049Z</modification><creation>2025-08-13T03:04:47.219Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11599547</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39621540</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s40200-024-01471-x</doi></cross_references></HashMap>