<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>27(4)</volume><submitter>Hones KM</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>To compare clinical outcomes following lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) versus RSA with latissimus dorsi transfer (LDT) in patients with poor preoperative active external rotation (ER).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We performed a systematic review per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We queried PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify articles reporting clinical outcomes of RSA with LDT or lateralized RSA alone performed in patients with preoperative ER ≤0°. Our primary outcomes were active ER, active forward elevation (FE), Constant score, and the incidence of complications.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>We included 12 RSA with LDT studies with 188 shoulders and 4 lateralized RSA without transfer</pubmed_abstract><journal>Clinics in shoulder and elbow</journal><pagination>464-478</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11615459</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Outcomes of lateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty versus latissimus dorsi transfer for external rotation deficit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11615459</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Bindi VE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rakauskas TR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>King JJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hao KA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gutowski CT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wright JO</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wright TW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hones KM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schoch BS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Werthel JD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Simcox T</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Outcomes of lateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty versus latissimus dorsi transfer for external rotation deficit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>To compare clinical outcomes following lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) versus RSA with latissimus dorsi transfer (LDT) in patients with poor preoperative active external rotation (ER).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We performed a systematic review per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We queried PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify articles reporting clinical outcomes of RSA with LDT or lateralized RSA alone performed in patients with preoperative ER ≤0°. Our primary outcomes were active ER, active forward elevation (FE), Constant score, and the incidence of complications.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>We included 12 RSA with LDT studies with 188 shoulders and 4 lateralized RSA without transfer</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Dec</publication><modification>2025-04-04T01:15:05.104Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T01:15:05.104Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11615459</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39558567</pubmed><doi>10.5397/cise.2024.00304</doi></cross_references></HashMap>