<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>37(4)</volume><submitter>Kramer A</submitter><pubmed_abstract>SUMMARYIn healthcare settings, contaminated surfaces play an important role in the transmission of nosocomial pathogens potentially resulting in healthcare-associated infections (HAI). Pathogens can be transmitted directly from frequent hand-touch surfaces close to patients or indirectly by staff and visitors. HAI risk depends on exposure, extent of contamination, infectious dose (ID), virulence, hygiene practices, and patient vulnerability. This review attempts to close a gap in previous reviews on persistence/tenacity by only including articles (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 171) providing quantitative data on re-cultivable pathogens from fomites for a better translation into clinical settings. We have therefore introduced the new term "replication capacity" (RC). The RC is affected by the degree of contam</pubmed_abstract><journal>Clinical microbiology reviews</journal><pagination>e0018623</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11640306</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>How long do bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and viruses retain their replication capacity on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review examining environmental resilience versus healthcare-associated infection risk by "fomite-borne risk assessment".</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11640306</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Eggers M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kramer A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Seifert U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Misailovski M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dancer SJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rutala W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bludau A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koster AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Scheithauer S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lexow F</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>How long do bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and viruses retain their replication capacity on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review examining environmental resilience versus healthcare-associated infection risk by "fomite-borne risk assessment".</name><description>SUMMARYIn healthcare settings, contaminated surfaces play an important role in the transmission of nosocomial pathogens potentially resulting in healthcare-associated infections (HAI). Pathogens can be transmitted directly from frequent hand-touch surfaces close to patients or indirectly by staff and visitors. HAI risk depends on exposure, extent of contamination, infectious dose (ID), virulence, hygiene practices, and patient vulnerability. This review attempts to close a gap in previous reviews on persistence/tenacity by only including articles (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 171) providing quantitative data on re-cultivable pathogens from fomites for a better translation into clinical settings. We have therefore introduced the new term "replication capacity" (RC). The RC is affected by the degree of contam</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Dec</publication><modification>2026-06-04T08:57:16.79Z</modification><creation>2026-05-07T03:12:14.108Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11640306</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39388143</pubmed><doi>10.1128/cmr.00186-23</doi></cross_references></HashMap>