<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Apolo AB</submitter><funding>Intramural NIH HHS</funding><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Cancer Institute Intramural Program</funding><funding>Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program</funding><funding>National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health</funding><funding>Merck</funding><funding>Center for Cancer Research</funding><pagination>45-55</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11698643</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>392(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma is an aggressive disease with high rates of relapse. Whether pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy would be effective in patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma after radical surgery is unknown.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive pembrolizumab at a dose of 200 mg every 3 weeks for 1 year or to undergo observation. Randomization was stratified according to pathological stage, centrally tested programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status, and previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The coprimary end points were disease-free survival and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. We considered the trial to be successful if either disease-free survival or overall survival was significantly longer with pembrolizumab than with observation.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 702 patients underwent randomization; 354 were assigned to receive pembrolizumab, and 348 were assigned to observation. As of July 5, 2024, the median duration of follow-up for disease-free survival was 44.8 months. The median disease-free survival was 29.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.0 to 40.7) with pembrolizumab and 14.2 months (95% CI, 11.0 to 20.2) with observation (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.90; two-sided P = 0.003). Grade 3 or higher adverse events (regardless of attribution) occurred in 50.6% of the patients in the pembrolizumab group and in 31.6% of the patients in the observation group.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Among patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma after radical surgery, disease-free survival was significantly longer with adjuvant pembrolizumab than with observation. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health and others; Alliance A031501 AMBASSADOR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03244384.).</pubmed_abstract><journal>The New England journal of medicine</journal><pubmed_title>Adjuvant Pembrolizumab versus Observation in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11698643</pmcid><funding_grant_id>UG1 CA233247</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1 CA233302</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1CA233337</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10CA180882</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 CA008748</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1 CA233327</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10CA180868 (NRG)</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1 TR001863</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1 CA233290</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1 CA233191</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1CA233160</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1CA233180</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1 CA233196</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1 CA233193</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1 CA233270</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>NCI ZIA BC 011351</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1CA239767</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1 CA232760</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1 CA233373</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1 CA233253</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1CA233327</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1CA233247</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1CA233302</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1 CA233337</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA180882</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>ZIA BC011351</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1 CA233180</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA180820</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1CA233193</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1CA233270</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1CA233191</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1CA233290</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1CA233253</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA180868</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1CA233373</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1 CA239767</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1 CA233160</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1CA233196</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA180821</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA180888</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10CA180820 (ECOG-ACRIN)</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1CA232760</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10CA180888</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10CA180821</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Wen Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Woods M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Simon N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Huang J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim WY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grivas P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Parikh R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Watt C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Reichert ZR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Morris MJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ballman KV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Teo MY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chatta G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Singh P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tripathi A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cole S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Srinivas S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Perez Burbano G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sharon E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Geynisman DM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cordes L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rosenberg JE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Odegaard M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McGregor B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Niglio S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Halabi S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hahn O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Apolo AB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim JW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Streicher H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Berg S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bilen MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Petrylak D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tan A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sonpavde G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hoffman-Censits J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ley L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sweis RF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mitchell C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moon H</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Adjuvant Pembrolizumab versus Observation in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma is an aggressive disease with high rates of relapse. Whether pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy would be effective in patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma after radical surgery is unknown.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive pembrolizumab at a dose of 200 mg every 3 weeks for 1 year or to undergo observation. Randomization was stratified according to pathological stage, centrally tested programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status, and previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The coprimary end points were disease-free survival and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. We considered the trial to be successful if either disease-free survival or overall survival was significantly longer with pembrolizumab than with observation.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 702 patients underwent randomization; 354 were assigned to receive pembrolizumab, and 348 were assigned to observation. As of July 5, 2024, the median duration of follow-up for disease-free survival was 44.8 months. The median disease-free survival was 29.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.0 to 40.7) with pembrolizumab and 14.2 months (95% CI, 11.0 to 20.2) with observation (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.90; two-sided P = 0.003). Grade 3 or higher adverse events (regardless of attribution) occurred in 50.6% of the patients in the pembrolizumab group and in 31.6% of the patients in the observation group.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Among patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma after radical surgery, disease-free survival was significantly longer with adjuvant pembrolizumab than with observation. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health and others; Alliance A031501 AMBASSADOR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03244384.).</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Jan</publication><modification>2026-06-01T23:13:03.156Z</modification><creation>2026-05-23T03:08:06.552Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11698643</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39282902</pubmed><doi>10.1056/NEJMoa2401726</doi></cross_references></HashMap>