<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>67(1)</volume><submitter>Sabik JF</submitter><funding>Medtronic</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>Safety, efficacy and durability are important considerations when selecting a bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement (AVR). This study assessed 7-year clinical outcomes and haemodynamic performance of the Avalus bioprosthesis.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Patients indicated for surgical AVR were enrolled in this prospective, nonrandomized trial, conducted across 39 sites globally. The primary end-point of this analysis was freedom from surgical explant or percutaneous valve-in-valve reintervention due to structural valve deterioration (SVD) at 7 years of follow-up, determined using Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis. We also evaluated a composite end-point of SVD and/or severe haemodynamic dysfunction requiring reintervention. Survival, valve-related safety events and haemodynamic perform</pubmed_abstract><journal>European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery</journal><pagination>ezae414</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11742136</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Seven-year outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement with a stented bovine pericardial bioprosthesis in over 1100 patients: a prospective multicentre analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11742136</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Baig K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gammie J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Leeuwen WJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kress D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rao V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Baker C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ouda A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ito S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kaufeld T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Duff S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Reardon MJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fischbein M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Klautz RJM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lange R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dawood M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wu T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brown WM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kshettry V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ribakove G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bapat V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shrestha M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cannon M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kuhn E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schonhoff F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bensari N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Falk V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Labrousse L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kiefer P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moritz A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Patel HJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sabik JF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Borger M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tahirkheli N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Oh JK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fukuhara S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>PERIGON Investigators</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pettersson G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Walther T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wahlers T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kerendi F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aldea G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Raikar G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gunzinger R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Adams DH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chu M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cartier R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koprivanac M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dagenais F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kappetein AP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hagberg R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Beaver T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Weber A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fullerton D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Carrel T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alfieri O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Svensson L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Misfeld M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ramlawi B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sundt T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ruel M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Holubec T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Takeda K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moront MG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Steffen RJ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Seven-year outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement with a stented bovine pericardial bioprosthesis in over 1100 patients: a prospective multicentre analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>Safety, efficacy and durability are important considerations when selecting a bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement (AVR). This study assessed 7-year clinical outcomes and haemodynamic performance of the Avalus bioprosthesis.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Patients indicated for surgical AVR were enrolled in this prospective, nonrandomized trial, conducted across 39 sites globally. The primary end-point of this analysis was freedom from surgical explant or percutaneous valve-in-valve reintervention due to structural valve deterioration (SVD) at 7 years of follow-up, determined using Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis. We also evaluated a composite end-point of SVD and/or severe haemodynamic dysfunction requiring reintervention. Survival, valve-related safety events and haemodynamic perform</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Dec</publication><modification>2026-06-01T20:05:50.247Z</modification><creation>2026-05-20T03:08:30.158Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11742136</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39565905</pubmed><doi>10.1093/ejcts/ezae414</doi></cross_references></HashMap>