<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><submitter>Alolayan S</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;b>Introduction:&lt;/b> Based on previously published US Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs), metformin continues to be promoted as "cost-effective." We reviewed a 10-year CEA to assess this. Treatment alternatives included placebo, branded metformin and individual lifestyle modification. Following the original CEA, we added group lifestyle as a modeled alternative. &lt;b>Methods:&lt;/b> Original published data were taken as given and re-analyzed according to accepted principles for calculating incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). With more than 2 treatments, these require attention to the rankings of interventions according to cost or effect prior to stipulating appropriate ICERs to calculate. &lt;b>Results:&lt;/b> With appropriate ICER calculations, metformin </pubmed_abstract><journal>American journal of lifestyle medicine</journal><pagination>15598276251315415</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11752154</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs) and Revised Metformin Cost-Effectiveness Conclusions in the Diabetes Prevention Program/ Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11752154</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Doucette J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rittenhouse BE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Segal AR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alolayan S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eguale T</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs) and Revised Metformin Cost-Effectiveness Conclusions in the Diabetes Prevention Program/ Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study.</name><description>&lt;b>Introduction:&lt;/b> Based on previously published US Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs), metformin continues to be promoted as "cost-effective." We reviewed a 10-year CEA to assess this. Treatment alternatives included placebo, branded metformin and individual lifestyle modification. Following the original CEA, we added group lifestyle as a modeled alternative. &lt;b>Methods:&lt;/b> Original published data were taken as given and re-analyzed according to accepted principles for calculating incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). With more than 2 treatments, these require attention to the rankings of interventions according to cost or effect prior to stipulating appropriate ICERs to calculate. &lt;b>Results:&lt;/b> With appropriate ICER calculations, metformin </description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Jan</publication><modification>2025-04-05T00:25:30.823Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T00:25:30.823Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11752154</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39850322</pubmed><doi>10.1177/15598276251315415</doi></cross_references></HashMap>