<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Twilt JJ</submitter><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><pagination>240-250</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11769734</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>87(2)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background and objective&lt;/h4>Biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI), excluding dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is a potential replacement for multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). An extensive international multireader multicase observer study was conducted to assess the noninferiority of bpMRI to mpMRI in csPCa diagnosis.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>An observer study was conducted with 400 mpMRI examinations from four European centers, excluding examinations with prior prostate treatment or csPCa (Gleason grade [GG] ≥2) findings. Readers assessed bpMRI and mpMRI sequentially, assigning lesion-specific Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores (3-5) and a patient-level suspicion score (0</pubmed_abstract><journal>European urology</journal><pubmed_title>Evaluating Biparametric Versus Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: An International, Paired, Noninferiority, Confirmatory Observer Study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11769734</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R37 CA260346</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Roest C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Withey S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Keyzer B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Girometti R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Macova I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bonekamp D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zawaideh JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Logager VB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Salomon G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bosma JS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Langkilde F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rau PR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kasivisvanathan V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Venderink W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Franco PN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gutierrez PA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grigiene R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Villeirs G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Futterer JJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moreira ASL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bittencourt LK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Giannarini G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brembilla G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Caglic I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fransen SJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jaderling F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Choi MH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Malakoti-Fard A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Ginneken B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schoots I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Huisman H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wallstrom J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Twilt JJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Law YM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cuocolo R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stanzione A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Saha A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Puech P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rouw D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cerny V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rusu M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Rooij M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Slootweg I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maciunien A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yakar D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kawashima A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pikuniene I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van der Lelij H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van den Bergh R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Khurram M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gitau S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bathen TF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kalpathy-Cramer J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Stiphout RSA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sunoqrot MRS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alis D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aringhieri G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rappaport A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tan N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Noordman CR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Padhani AR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ponsiglione A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee YJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barentsz J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ciuvasovas A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Run C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Raat HPJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maier-Hein KH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thimansson E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gaivao AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bjartell A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Falcao RO</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Panebianco V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guillaume R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Groeneveld M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tammisetti VS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>PI-CAI Consortium / list of collaborators</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hanus P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Geerdink J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rouviere O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Turkbey B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barrett T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ghai S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Takahashi N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Veltman J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Meakin J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Son H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Riccardo C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Immerzeel JJFM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pedersen BG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Briediene R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eijlers B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Obuchowski NA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Courrech Staal EFW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Visschere P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Penzkofer T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Elschot M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Evaluating Biparametric Versus Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: An International, Paired, Noninferiority, Confirmatory Observer Study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background and objective&lt;/h4>Biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI), excluding dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is a potential replacement for multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). An extensive international multireader multicase observer study was conducted to assess the noninferiority of bpMRI to mpMRI in csPCa diagnosis.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>An observer study was conducted with 400 mpMRI examinations from four European centers, excluding examinations with prior prostate treatment or csPCa (Gleason grade [GG] ≥2) findings. Readers assessed bpMRI and mpMRI sequentially, assigning lesion-specific Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores (3-5) and a patient-level suspicion score (0</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Feb</publication><modification>2026-06-01T08:56:34.725Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T22:23:22.613Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11769734</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39438187</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.eururo.2024.09.035</doi></cross_references></HashMap>