<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>8(1)</volume><submitter>Yan Y</submitter><pubmed_abstract>This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of large language models (LLMs) in improving the accuracy of Chinese ultrasound reports. Data from three hospitals (January-April 2024) including 400 reports with 243 errors across six categories were analyzed. Three GPT versions and Claude 3.5 Sonnet were tested in zero-shot settings, with the top two models further assessed in few-shot scenarios. Six radiologists of varying experience levels performed error detection on a randomly selected test set. In zero-shot setting, Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4o achieved the highest error detection rates (52.3% and 41.2%, respectively). In few-shot, Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperformed senior and resident radiologists, while GPT-4o excelled in spelling error detection. LLMs processed reports faster than the q</pubmed_abstract><journal>NPJ digital medicine</journal><pagination>66</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11775253</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>The use of large language models in detecting Chinese ultrasound report errors.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11775253</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Zhou L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang VY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yao J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zheng Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yang J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xu D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Du Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jiang T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yan Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Feng B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhou Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jin Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sui L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pan Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liang P</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The use of large language models in detecting Chinese ultrasound report errors.</name><description>This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of large language models (LLMs) in improving the accuracy of Chinese ultrasound reports. Data from three hospitals (January-April 2024) including 400 reports with 243 errors across six categories were analyzed. Three GPT versions and Claude 3.5 Sonnet were tested in zero-shot settings, with the top two models further assessed in few-shot scenarios. Six radiologists of varying experience levels performed error detection on a randomly selected test set. In zero-shot setting, Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4o achieved the highest error detection rates (52.3% and 41.2%, respectively). In few-shot, Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperformed senior and resident radiologists, while GPT-4o excelled in spelling error detection. LLMs processed reports faster than the q</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Jan</publication><modification>2025-04-03T23:26:40.764Z</modification><creation>2025-04-03T23:26:40.764Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11775253</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39875800</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41746-025-01468-7</doi></cross_references></HashMap>